Key result
Totally endoscopic aortic valve replacement resulted in a significantly shorter median total operating time (188 vs 206 min) compared to right transaxillary AVR, with similar complication rates.
Why the study?
Totally endoscopic aortic valve replacement remains a challenging operation with few published series; this study aimed to establish an endoscopic AVR method and evaluate its initial results.
Does totally endoscopic AVR via an anterolateral approach improve procedural times and safety compared to right transaxillary AVR?
Cohort (n=204)
Does totally endoscopic AVR via an anterolateral approach improve procedural times and safety compared to right transaxillary AVR?
Absolute Event Rate: 188% vs 206%
Totally endoscopic AVR via an anterolateral approach is feasible, safe, and associated with shorter total operating times compared to right transaxillary AVR with direct vision.
Endoscopic AVR may shorten operating times with comparable safety; leaves open need for randomized trials before practice change.
OBJECTIVES: Totally endoscopic aortic valve replacement (AVR) is still a challenging operation, and only a few series reports exist in the literature. The purposes of this study were to establish a method for endoscopic AVR and evaluate its initial results. METHODS: A total of 47 patients (median age 76 years, 17 men) underwent endoscopic AVR. The main wound was created in the right anterolateral 4th intercostal space through a 4-cm skin incision. No rib spreader was used. A 3-dimensional endoscope was inserted at the midaxillary line. A 5.5-mm trocar was inserted in the 3rd intercostal space, thus creating a 3-port setting similar to that used for endoscopic mitral valve surgery. A standard prosthesis was used, and the sutures were tied using a knot pusher. Results were compared with those of 157 patients who underwent right transaxillary AVR with direct vision plus endoscopic assist. RESULTS: Patient backgrounds did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. No deaths occurred in the entire series. There was no conversion to thoracotomy or sternotomy in the endoscopic AVR group. The complication rate did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. The total operating time was significantly shorter in endoscopic AVR (188-206 min); the cardiopulmonary bypass time (130-128 min) and the cross-clamp time (90-95 min) did not differ significantly (median, endoscopic AVR, right transaxillary AVR). Two patients underwent endoscopic double-valve (aortic and mitral) surgery under the same conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic AVR was possible through 3 ports created in the right anterolateral chest, similar to the procedure for endoscopic mitral valve surgery. By adopting a common approach for both the aortic and the mitral valve operations, endoscopic double-valve surgery can be performed seamlessly.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tokoro et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Aortic valve disease requiring replacement (n=204). Totally endoscopic aortic valve replacement vs. Right transaxillary aortic valve replacement was evaluated on Total operating time (minutes). Totally endoscopic aortic valve replacement resulted in a significantly shorter median total operating time (188 vs 206 min) compared to right transaxillary AVR, with similar complication rates.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: