Key result
Angiotensin system blockade plus a calcium channel blocker significantly reduced cardiovascular composite endpoints compared to other combinations (RR 0.80; 95% CI 0.70-0.91; P<.001).
Why the study?
Does angiotensin system blockade plus a calcium channel blocker reduce cardiovascular events compared to other combination therapies in hypertensive patients?
Meta-Analysis (n=20,451)
Does angiotensin system blockade plus a calcium channel blocker reduce cardiovascular events compared to other combination therapies in hypertensive patients?
Relative Risk: 0.8 (95% CI 0.7–0.91)
p-value: p=<.001
In hypertensive patients, combining an ACE inhibitor or ARB with a calcium channel blocker reduces cardiovascular events and serious adverse events more effectively than other antihypertensive combinations, despite similar blood pressure reductions.
Supports angiotensin system blockade plus calcium channel blocker as preferred hypertension combination; confirms lower cardiovascular event rates versus alternatives.
The authors aimed to investigate the superiority of angiotensin system blockade (angiotensin-converting enzyme [ACE] inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker [ARB]) plus a calcium channel blocker (CCB) (A+C) over other combination therapies in antihypertensive treatment. A meta-analysis in 20,451 hypertensive patients from eight randomized controlled trials was conducted to compare the A+C treatment with other combination therapies in terms of blood pressure (BP) reduction, clinical outcomes, and adverse events. The results showed that BP reduction did not differ significantly among the A+C therapy and other combination therapies in systolic and diastolic BP (P=.87 and P=.56, respectively). However, A+C therapy, compared with other combination therapies, achieved a significantly lower incidence of cardiovascular composite endpoints, including cardiovascular mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and nonfatal stroke (risk ratio [RR], 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70-0.91; P<.001), but similar all-cause mortality (RR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.77-1.04; P=.15) and stroke rates (RR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.77-1.04; P=.09). Moreover, A+C therapy yielded a 4.21 mL/min/1.73 m(2) lower estimated glomerular filtration rate reduction than other combinations (P<.001). Finally, A+C therapy showed a similar incidence of adverse events as other combination therapies (P=.34) but presented a significantly lower incidence of serious adverse events (RR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.73-0.98; P=.03). In conclusion, A+C therapy is superior to other combinations of antihypertensive treatment as it shows a lower incidence of cardiovascular events and adverse events, while it has similar effects in lowering BP and preserving renal function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chi et al. (2016) conducted a meta-analysis in Hypertension (n=20,451). Angiotensin system blockade (ACE inhibitor/ARB) plus a calcium channel blocker (A+C) vs. Other combination therapies was evaluated on Cardiovascular composite endpoints, including cardiovascular mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and nonfatal stroke (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.70-0.91, p=<.001). Angiotensin system blockade plus a calcium channel blocker significantly reduced cardiovascular composite endpoints compared to other combinations (RR 0.80; 95% CI 0.70-0.91; P<.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: