Key result
Body acceleration and arterial inclination enhance stenotic artery flow, while larger catheter radii reduce velocity.
This mathematical model provides insights into the coupled hemodynamic-thermal behavior of catheterized stenotic arteries, which may help optimize interventional procedures.
May guide catheter parameter optimization in modeled stenotic arteries; leaves open in vivo validation before clinical consideration.
This study develops a novel mathematical model to examine blood flow dynamics in a catheterized, inclined artery with overlapping stenoses, accounting for mild stenotic conditions. The analysis incorporates the combined influences of body acceleration, slip velocity, and viscous dissipation, while heat transfer is modeled via the Cattaneo-Christov framework to capture non-Fourier thermal effects. The coupled momentum and energy equations are solved analytically using a perturbation approach, yielding the expressions for wall shear stress, flow rate, velocity, and impedance. Parametric analysis reveals that higher body acceleration, slip velocity, and arterial inclination enhance both velocity and flow rate, whereas larger catheter radii reduce velocity. Wall shear stress intensifies in converging arterial segments due to elevated forces on the vessel wall. These results provide valuable insights into the coupled hemodynamic-thermal behavior of catheterized stenotic arteries, supporting improved clinical strategies for managing pathological arterial conditions and optimizing interventional procedures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2025 study studied Pathological arterial conditions (stenosis). Body acceleration, slip velocity, and arterial inclination was evaluated on Hemodynamic and thermal behavior (wall shear stress, flow rate, velocity, impedance). Higher body acceleration, slip velocity, and arterial inclination enhanced velocity and flow rate, whereas larger catheter radii reduced velocity in a mathematical model of a stenotic artery.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: