Key result
Coronary venous adenosine concentration did not significantly increase during atrial pacing (106.3 to 114.9 nmol/L, NS) or coronary occlusion, precluding its use as an index of myocardial ischaemia.
Why the study?
Does coronary venous adenosine concentration increase during induced myocardial ischaemia in patients?
Population
15 patients total: 3 with normal coronary arteries, 7 with obstructive coronary artery disease, and 5…
Comparison
Atrial pacing or coronary artery occlusion… vs Rest (baseline measurements)
Design
Cohort
Authors
Loading...
Findings do not support coronary venous adenosine as ischaemia marker; leaves open whether half-life or sampling limits detection in future studies.
Observational (n=15)
Does coronary venous adenosine concentration increase during induced myocardial ischaemia in patients?
Absolute Event Rate: 114.9% vs 106.3%
p-value: p=NS
The extremely short half-life of coronary venous adenosine precludes its use as a reliable index of myocardial ischaemia in patients.
Hamm et al. (1988) conducted an observational in Coronary artery disease and myocardial ischaemia (n=15). Atrial pacing and coronary artery occlusion vs. Rest was evaluated on Coronary venous adenosine concentration (p=NS). Coronary venous adenosine concentration did not significantly increase during atrial pacing (106.3 to 114.9 nmol/L, NS) or coronary occlusion, precluding its use as an index of myocardial ischaemia.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: