Key result
Azelnidipine significantly increased Valsalva baroreflex sensitivity (from 4.8 to 8.4 msec/mm Hg, P=0.001) and spontaneous baroreflex sensitivity, whereas amlodipine did not.
Why the study?
Does azelnidipine improve baroreflex sensitivity compared to amlodipine in patients with newly diagnosed untreated hypertension?
RCT (n=47)
Open-label
randomized
Does azelnidipine improve baroreflex sensitivity compared to amlodipine in patients with newly diagnosed untreated hypertension?
p-value: p=0.001
Azelnidipine, unlike amlodipine, improves baroreflex sensitivity in patients with newly diagnosed hypertension, which may offer additional cardiovascular risk reduction.
Azelnidipine may confer autonomic advantages over amlodipine in new hypertension; extends evidence for differential dihydropyridine effects on baroreflex sensitivity.
The effect of dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker (CCB) on baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) is not well described. We studied the effect of a new CCB, azelnidipine, compared with amlodipine, on BRS and ambulatory blood pressure (BP) in newly diagnosed untreated hypertension. This study was a prospective, randomized, and open-label study. We randomized patients to either azelnidipine or amlodipine treatment. Azelnidipine 8 to 16 mg (average 14.5 mg) and amlodipine 2.5 to 7.5 mg (average 4.9 mg) were used to lower the clinical BP <140/90 mm Hg. BRS, evaluated by the spontaneous and the Valsalva methods, and clinical and ambulatory BP were evaluated at baseline and after 13 weeks of each treatment. A total of 47 patients (age 53.1 +/- 10.8 years, 51% male), 26 in the azelnidipine group and 21 in the amlodipine group, completed the study. For baseline and after therapy respectively, both Valsalva-BRS (4.8 +/- 1.7 vs. 8.4 +/- 3.1 msec/mm Hg, P = 0.001) and spontaneous-BRS (5.5 +/- 2.5 vs. 8.2 +/- 5.6 msec/mm Hg, P = 0.019) were increased by azelnidipine, but amlodipine did not change them. Clinical and awake BPs were similarly reduced by each drug therapy. In conclusion, BRS was increased by azelnidipine therapy, but not by amlodipine therapy. This differential effect may be important in cardiovascular risk reduction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tomizawa et al. (2007) conducted an RCT in newly diagnosed untreated hypertension (n=47). Azelnidipine vs. Amlodipine was evaluated on Baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) evaluated by spontaneous and Valsalva methods (p=0.001). Azelnidipine significantly increased Valsalva baroreflex sensitivity (from 4.8 to 8.4 msec/mm Hg, P=0.001) and spontaneous baroreflex sensitivity, whereas amlodipine did not.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: