Key result
High cumulative remnant cholesterol, not triglycerides, links to ~43% higher CVD risk despite target LDL-C.
Why the study?
The impact of cumulative exposure to triglycerides and remnant cholesterol on cardiovascular disease risk in hypertensive patients with target LDL-C levels remains unclear.
Does high cumulative exposure to remnant cholesterol or triglycerides increase the risk of cardiovascular disease in hypertensive patients with target LDL-C?
Cohort (n=9,046)
Does high cumulative exposure to remnant cholesterol or triglycerides increase the risk of cardiovascular disease in hypertensive patients with target LDL-C?
Hazard Ratio: 1.43 (95% CI 1.24–1.64)
In hypertensive patients with target LDL-C levels, high cumulative remnant cholesterol, rather than cumulative triglycerides, is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease.
High cumulative remnant cholesterol may flag higher CVD risk in hypertensive patients with target LDL-C; leaves open whether targeting it improves outcomes.
Hypertensive patients are at high risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and require intensive lipids management. Triglycerides (TG) and remnant cholesterol (RC) contribute to residual risk beyond low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and cumulative exposure reflects a more comprehensive assessment. However, their impact on hypertensive patients with target LDL-C levels remains unclear. A total of 9046 hypertensive participants with target LDL-C levels who completed three health examinations (2006‒2010) were enrolled and followed until December 31, 2022. Cumulative burden was calculated as the average level multiplied by the interval between assessments. The primary outcome included a composite of CVD events (myocardial infarction [MI], ischemic stroke [IS], and hemorrhage stroke [HS]). Participants were categorized into four groups according to cumulative triglyceride (cumTG) (≥5.66 vs. <5.66 [median, mmol/L]) and cumulative RC (cumRC) (≥4.20 vs. <4.20 [median, mmol/L]): low cumTG and low cumRC, high cumTG and low cumRC, low cumTG and high cumRC, and high cumTG and high cumRC. Cox models were used to calculate the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) between the cumulative burden and CVD risk. During a median follow-up of 15.97 years, 1415 participants developed CVD. After multivariable adjustment, compared to the low cumTG/low cumRC group, CVD risk was higher in the high cumTG/high cumRC (HR 1.43, 95% CI 1.24‒1.64) and low cumTG/high cumRC groups (HR 1.24, 95% CI 1.05-1.47), but not in the high cumTG/low cumRC group (HR 1.06, 95% CI 0.89-1.25). In hypertensive patients with target LDL-C levels, high cumRC, rather than cumTG, is associated with an increased risk of CVD. Trial Registration: ChiCTR-TNC-11001489.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Hypertension with target LDL-C (n=9,046). High cumulative remnant cholesterol (cumRC) and triglycerides (cumTG) vs. Low cumTG and low cumRC was evaluated on Composite of CVD events (myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and hemorrhage stroke) (HR 1.43, 95% CI 1.24-1.64). High cumulative remnant cholesterol, rather than triglycerides, was associated with increased CVD risk in hypertensive patients with target LDL-C (HR 1.43; 95% CI 1.24-1.64 for high cumRC/high cumTG).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: