Key result
Among heart transplant candidates, the Heart Failure Survival Score predicted 1-year mortality (HR 0.64; 95% CI 0.43-0.95), while depression predicted clinical improvement (HR 0.12; 95% CI 0.02-0.89).
Why the study?
Do composite risk scores (HFSS, GTSS) and depression predict mortality and waiting-list outcomes in heart transplant candidates?
Cohort (n=318)
Yes
Do composite risk scores (HFSS, GTSS) and depression predict mortality and waiting-list outcomes in heart transplant candidates?
Hazard Ratio: 0.64 (95% CI 0.43–0.95)
p-value: p=0.029
Composite risk scores (HFSS, GTSS) and depression independently predict mortality, urgent transplantation, and clinical improvement in heart transplant candidates, supporting their use in risk stratification.
HFSS and depression may refine risk stratification in heart transplant candidates; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
We evaluated two composite risk scores, (Heart Failure Survival Score, HFSS; German Transplant Society Score, GTSS), and depression as predictors of mortality and competing waiting-list outcomes [high-urgency transplantation (HU-HTx), elective transplantation, delisting because of clinical improvement] in 318 heart transplant (HTx) candidates (18% women; aged 53 ± 11 years) from 17 hospitals and newly registered with Eurotransplant. Demographic variables and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, HADS) were assessed using questionnaires. Variables to compute HFSS and GTSS, age, medications, and outcomes were provided by Eurotransplant. At 12 months, 33 patients died, 83 received urgent HTx, 30 elective HTx, and 17 were delisted because of improvement. Applying cause-specific Cox regressions, only the HFSS was significantly associated with 1-year mortality [HR = 0.64 (95% CI = 0.43-0.95), P = 0.029]. The GTSS was the strongest predictor of HU-HTx [HR= 1.02 (95% CI = 1.01-1.02), P < 0.001]. Low depression scores contributed significantly to clinical improvement, even after adjusting for age and risk scores [HADS: HR = 0.12 (95% CI = 0.02-0.89), P = 0.039]. These findings confirm the usefulness of composite risk scores for the prediction of mortality and HU-HTx, validating both scores for their intended use. The finding that depression was an independent predictor of the waiting-list outcome clinical improvement suggests that considering patients' psychological attributes in addition to their medical characteristics is advisable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zahn et al. (2010) conducted a cohort in Heart transplant candidates (n=318). Composite risk scores (HFSS, GTSS) and depression was evaluated on 1-year mortality (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.43-0.95, p=0.029). Among heart transplant candidates, the Heart Failure Survival Score predicted 1-year mortality (HR 0.64; 95% CI 0.43-0.95), while depression predicted clinical improvement (HR 0.12; 95% CI 0.02-0.89).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: