An in vitro model system was developed to investigate the stroke rate and loading during hand, sonic, or ultrasonic instrumentation. The model system consisted of a mandibular molar tooth attached to a strain gauge and interface to a computer. Ten clinicians instrumented the distal canal of lower molar teeth. Stroke rates used and loads applied were measured using different sized files with the three different preparation techniques. There was no significant difference in stroke rates between different file sizes (p > 0.05) within the same generator, however, stroke rate for hand was significantly slower than for sonic or ultrasonic (p < 0.01). Loading of the canal wall rose with increase in file size which was significant for hand (p < 0.01) and sonic (p < 0.05) but not ultrasonic (p > 0.05). There was a tendency for loading to be higher with hand instrumentation, this however was not significant (p > 0.05).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lumley et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: