Key result
The age-adjusted Framingham risk score was a strong independent predictor of coronary heart disease (OR 20.098) and demonstrated better predictive power than flow-mediated dilation or pulse wave velocity in patients with stable angina.
Why the study?
Does the age-adjusted Framingham risk score, flow-mediated dilation, or pulse wave velocity better predict angiographic coronary heart disease in patients with stable angina?
Cross-Sectional (n=138)
No
Does the age-adjusted Framingham risk score, flow-mediated dilation, or pulse wave velocity better predict angiographic coronary heart disease in patients with stable angina?
Odds Ratio: 20.098 (95% CI 4.773–84.627)
p-value: p=<0.01
The age-adjusted Framingham risk score is a stronger predictor of angiographic coronary heart disease than flow-mediated dilation or pulse wave velocity in patients with stable angina.
Age-adjusted Framingham risk score may outperform vascular function tests for angiographic CHD prediction in stable angina; leaves open need for prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: To evaluate the age-adjusted Framingham risk score (AFRS), flow-mediated dilation (FMD) and brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) for the prediction of the coronary heart disease (CHD) in patients with stable angina. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 138 consecutive patients with stable angina, the interrelationship and predictive power of CHD were compared between the study parameters. In total, 71 patients demonstrated CHD after scheduled coronary angiography. The AFRS showed significant correlation with FMD (r = -0.43, P < 0.01) and baPWV (r = 0.41, P < 0.01). Based on AFRS, FMD, baPWV and other risk factors of CHD, multivariate analysis showed that AFRS and FMD (odds ratio (OR) 20.098, 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.773-84.627, P < 0.01, and OR 0.865, 95%CI 0.752-0.995, P < 0.05, respectively) were independent predictors of CHD. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for detecting CHD, AFRS, inverse FMD (iFMD) and baPWV were 0.863, 0.726 and 0.694, respectively (all P < 0.01). However, there was no difference of the area under the ROC curves between AFRS alone and combined complex parameters (AFRS plus iFMD, AFRS plus baPWV, and AFRS plus iFMD plus baPWV) for detecting CHD. CONCLUSIONS: AFRS was a better predictor of CHD than either FMD or baPWV in patients with stable angina. This means that conventional risk factors for cardiovascular disease do not affect uniformly for atherosclerosis in coronary and peripheral arteries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park et al. (2011) conducted a cross-sectional in Stable Angina (n=138). Age-adjusted Framingham risk score (AFRS) vs. Flow-mediated dilation (FMD) and brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) was evaluated on Presence of coronary heart disease (lumen diameter stenosis >50% in ≥1 major coronary artery) (OR 20.098, 95% CI 4.773-84.627, p=<0.01). The age-adjusted Framingham risk score was a strong independent predictor of coronary heart disease (OR 20.098) and demonstrated better predictive power than flow-mediated dilation or pulse wave velocity in patients with stable angina.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: