Key result
Higher resting heart rate (95-104 bpm vs 55-64 bpm) independently predicted a greater risk of developing metabolic syndrome over 4 years (OR 1.41; 95% CI 1.21-1.65).
Why the study?
Does higher resting heart rate predict the presence and future incidence of metabolic syndrome in a Chinese cohort?
Cohort (n=89,860)
Does higher resting heart rate predict the presence and future incidence of metabolic syndrome in a Chinese cohort?
Odds Ratio: 1.41 (95% CI 1.21–1.65)
Higher resting heart rate is independently associated with prevalent metabolic syndrome and predicts its future incidence over 4 years.
May support risk stratification in Chinese adults; extends prior associations but remains hypothesis-generating without causal evidence.
OBJECTIVE: Although higher resting heart rate (RHR) has emerged as a predictor for lifespan, the underlying mechanisms remain obscure. The present study investigates whether a positive relationship exists between RHR and metabolic syndrome (MetS) and whether RHR predicts future MetS. METHODS: A cohort of 89,860 participants were surveyed during 2006-2007 in Kailuan/Tangshan, China. MetS was diagnosed when a participant presented at least three of the following: abdominal adiposity, low high density lipoprotein-cholesterol, high triglycerides, hypertension or impaired fasting glucose. RHR was derived from ECG recordings and subjects were stratified based on RHR. Some participants without MetS at baseline were followed-up for 4 years. RESULTS: At baseline, 23,150 participants (25.76%) had MetS. There was a positive association between RHR and MetS. The OR of having MetS was 1.49 (95% CI 1.32 to 1.69) in subjects with RHR at 95-104 compared with those at 55-64 beats per minute (bpm) (reference), after adjusting for variables including age, sex, education, cigarette smoking, alcohol drinking, physical activities, body mass index, hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidaemia, inflammatory biomarkers and renal function. More importantly, when 43,725 individuals from the original study without MetS at baseline were followed-up, higher RHR was found to predict greater risk of MetS incidence. The OR of developing MetS 4 years later was 1.41 (95% CI 1.21 to 1.65) in subjects with RHR at 95-104 bpm compared with reference, after all adjustments. CONCLUSIONS: Our cross-sectional and longitudinal findings provide evidence that RHR is an independent risk factor for existing MetS and a powerful predictor for future incidence of MetS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jiang et al. (2014) conducted a cohort in Metabolic syndrome (n=89,860). Higher resting heart rate (95-104 bpm) vs. Resting heart rate at 55-64 bpm was evaluated on Incidence of metabolic syndrome (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.21 to 1.65). Higher resting heart rate (95-104 bpm vs 55-64 bpm) independently predicted a greater risk of developing metabolic syndrome over 4 years (OR 1.41; 95% CI 1.21-1.65).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: