Key result
High-frame-rate contrast-enhanced US velocimetry achieved flow quantification in 98% (41 of 42) of measured locations in patients with aortoiliac stenosis, though optimal quantification was limited to 38%.
Why the study?
Accurate quantification of blood flow in aortoiliac arteries is challenging but clinically relevant because local flow patterns can influence atherosclerotic disease.
Is two-dimensional blood flow quantification using high-frame-rate contrast-enhanced US and particle image velocimetry feasible in patients with aortoiliac stenosis?
Observational (n=35)
No
Is two-dimensional blood flow quantification using high-frame-rate contrast-enhanced US and particle image velocimetry feasible in patients with aortoiliac stenosis?
US velocimetry is feasible for quantifying blood flow in aortoiliac stenosis, but technical challenges like microbubble destruction and out-of-plane flow currently limit optimal visualization.
Supports feasibility of contrast-enhanced US velocimetry for aortoiliac flow; leaves open refinements needed for optimal quantification before clinical adoption.
Background The accurate quantification of blood flow in aortoiliac arteries is challenging but clinically relevant because local flow patterns can influence atherosclerotic disease. Purpose To investigate the feasibility and clinical application of two-dimensional blood flow quantification using high-frame-rate contrast-enhanced US (HFR-CEUS) and particle image velocimetry (PIV), or US velocimetry, in participants with aortoiliac stenosis. Materials and Methods In this prospective study, participants with a recently diagnosed aortoiliac stenosis underwent HFR-CEUS measurements of the pre- and poststenotic vessel segments (August 2018 to July 2019). Two-dimensional quantification of blood flow was achieved by performing PIV analysis, which was based on pairwise cross-correlation of the HFR-CEUS images. Visual inspection of the entire data set was performed by five observers to evaluate the ability of the technique to enable adequate visualization of blood flow. The contrast-to-background ratio and average vector correlation were calculated. In two participants who showed flow disturbances, the flow complexity and vorticity were calculated. Results Thirty-five participants (median age, 67 years; age range, 56–84 years; 22 men) were included. Visual scoring showed that flow quantification was achieved in 41 of 42 locations. In 25 locations, one or multiple issues occurred that limited optimal flow quantification, including loss of correlation during systole (n = 12), shadow regions (n = 8), a short vessel segment in the image plane (n = 7), and loss of contrast during diastole (n = 5). In the remaining 16 locations, optimal quantification was achieved. The contrast-to-background ratio was higher during systole than during diastole (11.0 ± 2.9 vs 6.9 ± 3.4, respectively; P < .001), whereas the vector correlation was lower (0.58 ± 0.21 vs 0.47 ± 0.13; P < .001). The flow complexity and vorticity were high in regions with disturbed flow. Conclusion Blood flow quantification with US velocimetry is feasible in patients with an aortoiliac stenosis, but several challenges must be overcome before implementation into clinical practice. Clinical trial registration no. NTR6980 © RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Engelhard et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease (n=35). High-frame-rate contrast-enhanced US (HFR-CEUS) with particle image velocimetry was evaluated on Feasibility of flow quantification (visual scoring). High-frame-rate contrast-enhanced US velocimetry achieved flow quantification in 98% (41 of 42) of measured locations in patients with aortoiliac stenosis, though optimal quantification was limited to 38%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: