Key result
Medtronic model 6972-58 polyurethane-insulated ventricular pacing leads experienced a 15.2% clinical failure rate (16 of 105 leads) at a mean of 20.5 months post-implant.
Why the study?
What is the failure rate and clinical presentation of failure for Medtronic model 6972-58 polyurethane-insulated ventricular pacing leads?
Observational (n=105)
What is the failure rate and clinical presentation of failure for Medtronic model 6972-58 polyurethane-insulated ventricular pacing leads?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The Medtronic model 6972-58 polyurethane-insulated ventricular pacing lead exhibits a high clinical failure rate at a mean of 20.5 months, primarily due to insulation rupture.
During a 44-month period, 105 Medtronic model 6972-58 polyurethane-insulated, bipolar ventricular pacing leads were implanted, of which 16 failed clinically at a mean of 20.5 months post-implant. Pacing dysfunction presented as either intermittent or complete loss of sensing and/or capture and, rarely, oversensing . Thirteen of the 16 patients were asymptomatic, and problems were detected in 11 instances during routine telephonic surveillance. At the time of lead replacement, low or widely fluctuating lead resistance values and high current drain were uniformly observed. The single lead capable of total extraction revealed rupture of both internal and external insulation. A brief summary of the currently much-discussed "polyurethane controversy" is presented, and the issue of patient management is discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
John S. Hanson (1984) conducted an observational in Patients requiring ventricular pacing (n=105). Medtronic model 6972-58 polyurethane-insulated, bipolar ventricular pacing lead was evaluated on Clinical failure of the pacing lead. Medtronic model 6972-58 polyurethane-insulated ventricular pacing leads experienced a 15.2% clinical failure rate (16 of 105 leads) at a mean of 20.5 months post-implant.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: