Why the study?
What is the clinical profile and outcome of patients presenting with neuroleptic malignant syndrome associated with classic versus newer antipsychotics?
Observational (n=18)
What is the clinical profile and outcome of patients presenting with neuroleptic malignant syndrome associated with classic versus newer antipsychotics?
Both classic and newer antipsychotics carry the potential for neuroleptic malignant syndrome, presenting with similar clinical profiles and generally allowing for complete recovery.
Neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) is a potentially fatal adverse event associated with the use of antipsychotics (AP). The objective of this study was to investigate the profile of cases of NMS and to compare our findings with those published in similar settings. A series of 18 consecutive patients with an established diagnosis of NMS was analyzed, gathering data on demography, symptoms and signs. Two thirds of all cases involved woman with a past medical history of psychiatric disorder receiving relatively high doses of AP. The signs and symptoms of NMS episodes were similar to those reported in other series and only one case had a fatal outcome, the remaining presenting complete recovery. As expected, more than two thirds of our cases were using classic AP (68%), however the clinical profile of these in comparison with those taking newer agent was similar. Newer AP also carry the potential for NMS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moscovich et al. (2011) conducted an observational in Neuroleptic malignant syndrome (n=18). Antipsychotics vs. Newer antipsychotics was evaluated on Clinical profile and outcomes of NMS.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: