Key result
Insulin resistance was an independent predictor of coronary artery calcium in young men (OR 1.25) but not in young women, who maintained a lower cardiovascular risk profile regardless of insulin sensitivity.
Cross-Sectional (n=10,511)
No
Insulin resistance is an independent predictor of coronary artery calcium in young men but not in young women, suggesting it does not fully explain the gender disparity in early cardiovascular risk.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Does not support incorporating insulin resistance into CAC risk models for young women; leaves open sex-specific pathways in early atherosclerosis.
BACKGROUND: The gender disparity in cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk is greatest between young men and women. However, the causes of that are not fully understood. The objective of this study was to evaluate the relationship between insulin resistance and the presence of coronary artery calcium (CAC) to identify risk factors that may predispose young men and women to CVD. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Insulin resistance and CVD risk factors were examined in 8682 Korean men and 1829 women aged 30-45 years old. Insulin resistance was estimated using the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), and CAC was measured using computed tomography. Women were less likely to be insulin resistant (upper quartile of HOMA-IR, 18% vs. 27%, p<0.001) and had a lower prevalence of CAC (1.6% vs. 6.4%, p<0.001). Even when equally insulin resistant men and women were compared, women continued to have lower prevalence of CAC (3.1% vs. 7.2%, p = 0.004) and a more favorable CVD risk profile. Finally, after adjustment for traditional CVD risk factors, insulin resistance remained an independent predictor of CAC only in men (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Young women have a lower risk for CVD and a lower CAC prevalence compared with men. This favorable CVD risk profile in women appears to occur regardless of insulin sensitivity. Unlike men, insulin resistance was not a predictor of CAC in women in this cohort. Therefore, insulin resistance has less impact on CVD risk and CAC in young women compared with men, and insulin resistance alone does not explain the gender disparity in CVD risk that is observed at an early age.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sung et al. (2013) conducted a cross-sectional in Insulin Resistance and Coronary Artery Calcium (n=10,511). Insulin resistance (upper quartile of HOMA-IR) vs. Insulin sensitive (lower HOMA-IR) was evaluated on Presence of coronary artery calcium (CAC > 0) in men (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.03-1.52, p=0.03). Insulin resistance was an independent predictor of coronary artery calcium in young men (OR 1.25) but not in young women, who maintained a lower cardiovascular risk profile regardless of insulin sensitivity.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: