Key result
Coronary artery calcium (CAC) predicts total and CVD mortality more strongly in women than in men with diabetes (interaction P=0.01 for total mortality).
Why the study?
Diabetes is a stronger risk factor for CVD in women than men, but the sex-specific impact of coronary artery calcium on mortality in diabetes is less defined.
Does the prognostic value of coronary artery calcium for mortality differ between women and men with diabetes?
Cohort (n=4,503)
Does the prognostic value of coronary artery calcium for mortality differ between women and men with diabetes?
Hazard Ratio: 1.28
p-value: p=0.01
Coronary artery calcium is a stronger predictor of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in women with diabetes compared to men with diabetes.
CAC may stratify CVD mortality risk more strongly in women with diabetes; leaves open whether sex-specific thresholds improve outcomes.
OBJECTIVE While diabetes has been previously noted to be a stronger risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD) in women compared with men, whether this is still the case is not clear. Coronary artery calcium (CAC) predicts coronary heart disease (CHD) and CVD in people with diabetes; however, its sex-specific impact is less defined. We compared the relation of CAC in women versus men with diabetes for total, CVD, and CHD mortality. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We studied adults with diabetes from a large registry of patients with CAC scanning with mortality follow-up over 11.5 years. Cox regression examined the relation of CAC with mortality end points. RESULTS Among 4,503 adults with diabetes (32.5% women) aged 21–93 years, 61.2% of women and 80.4% of men had CAC >0. Total, CVD, and CHD mortality rates were directly related to CAC; women had higher total and CVD death rates than men when CAC >100. Age- and risk factor–adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) per log unit CAC were higher among women versus men for total mortality (1.28 vs. 1.18) (interaction P = 0.01) and CVD mortality (1.47 vs. 1.27) (interaction P = 0.04) but were similar for CHD mortality (1.48 and 1.48). For CVD mortality, HRs with CAC scores of 101–400 and >400 were 3.67 and 6.27, respectively, for women and 1.63 and 3.48, respectively, for men (interaction P = 0.04). For total mortality, HRs were 2.56 and 4.05 for women, respectively, and 1.88 and 2.66 for men, respectively (interaction P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS CAC predicts CHD, CVD, and all-cause mortality in patients with diabetes; however, greater CAC predicts CVD and total mortality more strongly in women.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wong et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Diabetes (n=4,503). Coronary artery calcium (CAC) vs. Men (for sex differences) or lower CAC scores was evaluated on Total mortality per log unit CAC (HR 1.28, p=0.01). Coronary artery calcium (CAC) predicts total and CVD mortality more strongly in women than in men with diabetes (interaction P=0.01 for total mortality).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: