Key result
Diabetes equalizes incident CAD risk between men and women, eliminating the typical male disadvantage.
Why the study?
Does diabetes increase the risk of incident coronary artery disease differently in young and middle-aged women compared to men?
Meta-Analysis (n=11,517)
Yes
Does diabetes increase the risk of incident coronary artery disease differently in young and middle-aged women compared to men?
Diabetes equalizes the risk of coronary artery disease between young and middle-aged men and women, supporting aggressive cardiovascular prevention strategies in women with diabetes.
Diabetes may equalize CAD risk between sexes under 60; extends observational cohorts but leaves open prospective confirmation before practice change.
OBJECTIVE: Controversy exists about the coronary artery disease (CAD) risk conveyed by diabetes in young and middle-aged women. We investigated sex differences in CAD by diabetes status among healthy individuals with different underlying risks of heart disease. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We examined subjects aged <60 years without CAD at enrollment in the high-risk GeneSTAR Study (n = 1,448; follow-up ∼12 years), Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA; n = 3,072; follow-up ∼7 years), and National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III (NHANES III) Mortality Follow-up Study (n = 6,997; follow-up ∼15 years). Diabetes was defined by report, hypoglycemic use, and/or fasting glucose ≥126 mg/dL. The outcome was any CAD event during follow-up (fatal CAD in NHANES). RESULTS: In the absence of diabetes, CAD rates were lower among women in GeneSTAR, MESA, and NHANES (4.27, 1.66, and 0.40/1,000 person-years, respectively) versus men (11.22, 5.64, and 0.88/1,000 person-years); log-rank P < 0.001 (GeneSTAR/MESA) and P = 0.07 (NHANES). In the presence of diabetes, CAD event rates were similar among women (17.65, 7.34, and 2.37/1,000 person-years) versus men (12.86, 9.71, and 1.83/1,000 person-years); all log-rank P values > 0.05. Adjusting for demographics, diabetes was associated with a significant four- to fivefold higher CAD rate among women in each cohort, without differences in men. In meta-analyses of three cohorts, additionally adjusted for BMI, smoking, hypertension, HDL, and non-HDL cholesterol, antihypertensive and cholesterol-lowering medication use, the hazard ratio of CAD in men versus women among nondiabetes was 2.43 (1.76-3.35) and diabetes was 0.89 (0.43-1.83); P = 0.013 interaction by diabetes status. CONCLUSIONS: Though young and middle-aged women are less likely to develop CAD in the absence of diabetes, the presence of diabetes equalizes the risk by sex. Our findings support aggressive CAD prevention strategies in women with diabetes and at similar levels to those that exist in men.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kalyani et al. (2013) conducted a meta-analysis in Healthy young and middle-aged adults without coronary artery disease (n=11,517). Diabetes vs. No diabetes was evaluated on Incident coronary artery disease (men vs women among those with diabetes) (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.43-1.83, p=0.013). The presence of diabetes equalized the risk of incident coronary artery disease between men and women (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.43-1.83), whereas men had a significantly higher risk in the absence of diabetes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: