Key result
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in a failing surgical aortic bioprosthesis was technically successful in 94% of cases, with 30-day and 1-year mortality rates of 11% and 28%, respectively.
Why the study?
Does transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) provide a safe and effective treatment for high-risk patients with a failing surgical aortic bioprosthesis?
Observational (n=18)
Yes
Does transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) provide a safe and effective treatment for high-risk patients with a failing surgical aortic bioprosthesis?
TAVI is a technically feasible and effective valve-in-valve treatment option for high-risk patients with failing surgical aortic bioprostheses, demonstrating acceptable short- and mid-term outcomes.
Supports valve-in-valve TAVI feasibility in high-risk cases; leaves open durability, safety, and comparative outcomes.
OBJECTIVES: The feasibility of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in patients with a failing surgical aortic bioprosthesis has been reported from single centres. We present results from a multi-centre feasibility study in such patients followed for 1 year after TAVI. METHODS: This study evaluated 18 patients undergoing implantation with the 18-Fr CoreValve TAVI prosthesis in a failing surgical aortic bioprosthesis at three centres in Germany. Subject inclusion requirements included ≥ 75 years old and either surgical risk with logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation ≥ 15% or ≥ 1 high-risk co-morbidity. RESULTS: Implanted subjects were 79 ± 4 years old, 67% males, 78% NYHA Class III/IV, with logistic EuroSCORE 34 ± 14, and had failed surgical bioprostheses from six manufacturers. The procedure was considered technically successful in 94% (17/18) of cases. One subject was converted to surgery during the procedure. Mortality at 30 days and 1 year was 11% (2/18) and 28% (5/18), respectively. Two cardiac deaths occurred, including 1 within 30 days. Two subjects had strokes, both within 30 days. After 30 days and 1 year, respectively, 86 and 73% of subjects improved at least 1 NYHA class and the remainder had no change. No aortic regurgitation was reported beyond mild (Grade 1) at 6- and 12-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with a failing aortic surgical bioprosthesis were successfully implanted with a TAVI prosthesis in this multi-centre feasibility study. Outcomes at 30 days were within expectations for this very high-risk subgroup and improvements were sustained through 12 months.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ong et al. (2012) conducted an observational in Failing surgical aortic bioprosthesis (n=18). Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with 18-Fr CoreValve was evaluated on Technical success. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in a failing surgical aortic bioprosthesis was technically successful in 94% of cases, with 30-day and 1-year mortality rates of 11% and 28%, respectively.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: