Key result
High pre-operative common carotid intima-media thickness predicted secondary cardiovascular events after CABG in univariate analysis (OR 1.67; 95% CI 1.14-2.46; P=0.009) but was not an independent predictor.
Why the study?
Does elevated preoperative common carotid intima-media thickness predict secondary cardiovascular events in patients undergoing CABG?
Cohort (n=609)
Does elevated preoperative common carotid intima-media thickness predict secondary cardiovascular events in patients undergoing CABG?
Odds Ratio: 1.67 (95% CI 1.14–2.46)
p-value: p=0.009
Preoperative common carotid intima-media thickness measurement does not provide independent prognostic value over standard clinical data for predicting secondary cardiovascular events after CABG.
Preoperative carotid IMT lacks independent prognostic value after CABG; leaves open its incremental role in refined risk models.
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess the utility of common carotid intima-media thickness (CCA-IMT) to predict secondary cardiovascular events after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). In primary prevention, carotid-IMT is known as a valuable cardiovascular risk marker, but its interest in secondary prevention has been less studied. We hypothesized that CCA-IMT could be used for peri-operative and long-term risk stratification in candidates for CABG. METHODS: A total of 609 patients (66.8+/-9.2 years) were prospectively enrolled for preoperative CCA-IMT measurement and follow-up. The primary end-point combined cardiovascular death, non-fatal acute coronary syndromes, stroke, secondary coronary revascularization and peripheral arterial surgery during follow-up. The secondary end-point was the 1-month post-operative death. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed by usual methods. RESULTS: A subgroup of 150 patients (24.6%) was individualized with a CCA-IMT above 90th percentile (>0.90 mm) or presenting plaques in their CCA. At 1 month, there was no significant difference in the prevalence of elevated CCA-IMT between deceased patients and survivors (16.7 vs. 24.9%, P=ns). During a mean follow-up of 41.8+/-16 months, 121 patients (19.8%) met the primary end-point. High CCA-IMT was predictive (OR=1.67, 95% CI 1.14-2.46, P=0.009) in the univariate analysis. In the multivariate analysis, age (OR=1.03, 95% CI 1.00-1.05, P=0.029) concomitant valvular surgery (OR=2.17, P=0.003) arrhythmia (OR=2.20, P=0.021), and peripheral arterial disease (OR=2.41, P<0.001) were significant independent prognostic factors whereas CCA-IMT failed to remain independently significant. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-operative CCA-IMT can provide prognostic information for candidates to CABG. However, clinical data present stronger prognostic values.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aboyans et al. (2005) conducted a cohort in Coronary artery disease requiring CABG (n=609). High common carotid intima-media thickness (>0.90 mm or plaques) vs. Normal common carotid intima-media thickness was evaluated on Combined cardiovascular death, non-fatal acute coronary syndromes, stroke, secondary coronary revascularization and peripheral arterial surgery (OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.14-2.46, p=0.009). High pre-operative common carotid intima-media thickness predicted secondary cardiovascular events after CABG in univariate analysis (OR 1.67; 95% CI 1.14-2.46; P=0.009) but was not an independent predictor.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: