Key result
A higher Charlson comorbidity index was associated with increased all-cause mortality (HR 1.10; 95% CI 1.06-1.13; P<0.001) following ICD generator replacement.
Why the study?
Recipients of ICD generator replacement with multiple comorbidities may have higher risk of adverse outcomes that attenuate the benefit of replacement, but the association between CCI and outcomes was unclear.
Does the Charlson comorbidity index predict outcomes after implantable cardioverter defibrillator generator replacement?
Cohort (n=1,421)
Yes
Does the Charlson comorbidity index predict outcomes after implantable cardioverter defibrillator generator replacement?
A higher Charlson comorbidity index is strongly predictive of mortality and death without appropriate therapy following ICD generator replacement, suggesting that the benefit of replacement in patients with multiple comorbidities (CCI ≥5) should be carefully considered.
CCI may inform risk discussions before ICD replacement; leaves open net benefit in high-comorbidity patients.
BACKGROUND: Recipients of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) generator replacement with multiple medical comorbidities may be at higher risk of adverse outcomes that attenuate the benefit of ICD replacement. The aim of this investigation was to study the association between the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) and outcomes after ICD generator replacement. METHODS: All patients undergoing first ICD generator replacement at Mayo Clinic, Rochester and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston between 2001 and 2011 were identified. Outcomes included: (a) all-cause mortality, (b) appropriate ICD therapy, and (c) death prior to appropriate therapy. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed to assess association between CCI and outcomes. RESULTS: We identified 1421 patients with mean age of 69.6 ± 12.1 years, 81% male and median (range) CCI of 3 (0-18). During a mean follow-up of 3.9 ± 3 years, 52% of patients died, 30.6% experienced an appropriate therapy, and 23.6% died without experiencing an appropriate therapy. In multivariable analysis, higher CCI score was associated with increased all-cause mortality (Hazard ratio, HR 1.10 [1.06-1.13] per 1 point increase in CCI, P < .001), death without prior appropriate therapy (HR 1.11 [1.07-1.15], P < .0001), but not associated with appropriate therapy (HR 1.01 [0.97-1.05], P = .53). Patients with CCI ≥5 had an annual risk of death of 12.2% compared to 8.7% annual rate of appropriate therapy. CONCLUSIONS: CCI is predictive of mortality following ICD generator replacement. The benefit of ICD replacement in patients with CCI score ≥5 should be investigated in prospective studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Amin et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in ICD generator replacement (n=1,421). Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) vs. Lower CCI score (per 1 point increase) was evaluated on All-cause mortality (HR 1.10, 95% CI 1.06-1.13, p=<.001). A higher Charlson comorbidity index was associated with increased all-cause mortality (HR 1.10; 95% CI 1.06-1.13; P<0.001) following ICD generator replacement.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: