Key result
A DARC risk score >2.5 at the time of CRT-D generator replacement was associated with significantly higher 5-year mortality compared to a score <1.5 (57% vs. 6%; p < 0.001).
Why the study?
At CRT-D replacement, higher age and comorbidities may attenuate the benefit of ICD therapy, prompting evaluation of comorbidity progression, its link to postreplacement mortality, and risk prediction.
Cohort (n=218)
Yes
Absolute Event Rate: 57% vs 6%
p-value: p=< .001
The DARC risk score accurately predicts 5-year mortality in patients undergoing CRT-D generator replacement, identifying a high-risk subgroup that may derive limited survival benefit from continued ICD protection.
INTRODUCTION: Cardiac resynchronization defibrillator (CRT-D) as primary prevention is known to reduce mortality. At the time of replacement, higher age and comorbidities may attenuate the benefit of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the progression of comorbidities after implantation and their association with mortality following CRT-D generator replacement. In addition, a risk score was developed to identify patients at high risk for mortality after replacement. METHODS AND RESULTS: We identified patients implanted with a primary prevention CRT-D (n = 648) who subsequently underwent elective generator replacement (n = 218) from two prospective ICD registries. The cohort consisted of 218 patients (median age: 70 years, male gender: 73%, mean left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF]: 36 ± 11% at replacement). Median follow-up after the replacement was 4.2 years during which 64 patients (29%) died and 11 patients (5%) received appropriate ICD shocks. An increase in comorbidities was observed in 77 patients (35%). The 5-year mortality rate was 41% in patients with ≥2 comorbidities at the time of replacement. A risk score incorporating age, gender, LVEF, atrial fibrillation, anemia, chronic kidney disease, and history of appropriate ICD shocks at time of replacement accurately predicted 5-year mortality (C-statistic 0.829). Patients with a risk score of greater than 2.5 had excess mortality at 5-year postreplacement compared with patients with a risk score less than 1.5 (57% vs. 6%; p < .001). CONCLUSION: A simple risk score accurately predicts 5-year mortality after replacement in CRT-D patients, as patients with a risk score of greater than 2.5 are at high risk of dying despite ICD protection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Theuns et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Primary prevention CRT-D patients undergoing elective generator replacement (n=218). DARC risk score > 2.5 vs. DARC risk score < 1.5 was evaluated on 5-year mortality (p=< .001). A DARC risk score >2.5 at the time of CRT-D generator replacement was associated with significantly higher 5-year mortality compared to a score <1.5 (57% vs. 6%; p < 0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: