Key result
Minimally invasive implantation of the Medtentia double helix annuloplasty ring significantly reduced recovery time compared to midline sternotomy in a porcine model (80 vs 327 minutes, P<0.01).
Why the study?
Does implantation of the Medtentia double helix annuloplasty ring using a minimally invasive approach compared to conventional midline sternotomy provide safe and feasible outcomes in a porcine model?
Does implantation of the Medtentia double helix annuloplasty ring using a minimally invasive approach compared to conventional midline sternotomy provide safe and feasible outcomes in a porcine model?
The Medtentia double helix annuloplasty ring demonstrated safety and feasibility in a porcine model using both minimally invasive and conventional sternotomy approaches at 10 weeks.
Faster recovery with minimally invasive annuloplasty may inform human trials; leaves open translation from porcine model.
OBJECTIVE: : To further develop and improve minimally invasive surgical procedures, dedicated appropriate surgical devices are mandatory. In this study, the safety and feasibility of implanting the novel Medtentia double helix mitral annuloplasty ring, which uses the key-ring principle to potentially allow faster and sutureless implantation, was assessed using both minimally invasive and conventional surgical techniques. Because of ethical concerns, a human compatible porcine experimental model of mitral valve surgery was used. METHODS: : Twelve 50-kg pigs were allocated to implantation of the Medtentia double helix annuloplasty ring using conventional midline sternotomy including cardioplegic arrest or a minimally invasive approach using peripheral cannulation and left ventricular fibrillation. Ten weeks after surgery, echocardiography was performed to assess mitral valve function. Animals were then killed, and gross mitral valve anatomy was examined ex vivo. RESULTS: : All animals survived 10 weeks without developing mitral regurgitation, structural leaflet damage, ring dehiscence, or endocarditis. In the minimally invasive compared with the midline sternotomy group (mean ± SD), significantly reduced recovery time (80 ± 16 vs. 327 ± 23 minutes, P < 0.01) and a tendency toward increased operating time (199 ± 33 vs. 168 ± 15 minutes, P > 0.05) and cardiopulmonary bypass time (98 ± 12 vs. 91 ± 11 minutes, P > 0.05) were observed. CONCLUSIONS: : By using a both minimally invasive and conventional midline sternotomy implantation techniques, the Medtentia double helix annuloplasty ring showed no mitral valve dysfunction or tissue damage 10 weeks postoperatively.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jensen et al. (2010) studied Mitral valve surgery (porcine model) (n=12). Minimally invasive implantation of Medtentia double helix annuloplasty ring vs. Conventional midline sternotomy implantation was evaluated on Recovery time (minutes) (p=<0.01). Minimally invasive implantation of the Medtentia double helix annuloplasty ring significantly reduced recovery time compared to midline sternotomy in a porcine model (80 vs 327 minutes, P<0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: