Key result
In patients undergoing percutaneous mitral valve repair with MitraClip, a logEuroSCORE ≥20 was associated with higher in-hospital mortality compared to a score <20 (4.3% vs 1.1%, P≤0.01).
Why the study?
Does percutaneous mitral valve repair with the MitraClip system have acceptable in-hospital outcomes in high-risk patients (logistic EuroSCORE ≥ 20) compared to lower-risk patients?
Population
1002 patients undergoing percutaneous mitral valve repair with the MitraClip system in the German…
Comparison
Percutaneous mitral valve repair with the… vs Percutaneous mitral valve repair with the…
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
in-hospital
Authors
Loading...
Supports risk stratification by logEuroSCORE for MitraClip; leaves open net benefit versus medical therapy in highest-risk patients.
Observational (n=1,002)
Yes
Does percutaneous mitral valve repair with the MitraClip system have acceptable in-hospital outcomes in high-risk patients (logistic EuroSCORE ≥ 20) compared to lower-risk patients?
Absolute Event Rate: 4.3% vs 1.1%
p-value: p=≤0.01
Percutaneous mitral valve repair with the MitraClip system is feasible in high-risk patients (logEuroSCORE ≥ 20), with in-hospital mortality that is higher than in lower-risk patients but lower than predicted by the surgical risk score.
Wiebe et al. (2014) conducted an observational in Mitral valve regurgitation (n=1,002). logEuroSCORE ≥ 20 vs. logEuroSCORE < 20 was evaluated on In-hospital mortality (p=≤0.01). In patients undergoing percutaneous mitral valve repair with MitraClip, a logEuroSCORE ≥20 was associated with higher in-hospital mortality compared to a score <20 (4.3% vs 1.1%, P≤0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: