Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Fifty-four patients with diffuse non-toxic goitre were observed before and under therapy either with 125 μg LT4 (group A) or 75 μg LT4 + 15 μg LT3 (group B) in a prospective double blind study, using 1-, 3- and 6-months controls. Changes in goitre size have been estimated by ultrasonic scanning. Both treatment forms provided a significant reduction of goitre size, even after 1 month of therapy: a 20%-decrease in group A and 16% in group B. The 6-month reduction was about 30% in group A and 27% in group B. Between the 2 groups there were no differences in the reduction of volume. The suppression of the TSH-response to TRH was identical in both groups, too. In group A there was a predominant increase of the TT4-and FT4-serum levels, both reaching the hyperthyroid range. In group B there was a predominant increase of the TT3- and FT3-serum levels and a slight increase of the FT4-levels. The TT3- and FT3-serum levels also exceeded the upper normal range. As the blood samples were drawn about 2 h after medication, acute hormone resorption influenced these data. In the 3-month controls only there was a significant correlation between the reduction of the thyroid volume and the suppression of TSH-release. In the 6-month controls we found a weak correlation of the reduction of volume and the decrease of the pertechnetate uptake value. No correlation was found between the relative changes of FT3- and FT4-serum levels and the reduction of goitre size. There were no indications of possible side effects in group A or B during treatment. So this study showed the compared treatment forms to be equivalent in the therapy of diffuse non-toxic goitre, both yielding excellent results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bongers et al. (1986) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: