Key result
In patients undergoing staged PCI and minimally invasive valve surgery, intermediate-high complexity CAD was associated with higher repeat target vessel revascularization than low complexity CAD (16.7% vs 0.8%).
Why the study?
Does coronary artery disease complexity (Syntax score >22 vs 0-22) affect outcomes in patients undergoing a staged approach of PCI followed by minimally invasive valve surgery?
Cohort (n=138)
No
Does coronary artery disease complexity (Syntax score >22 vs 0-22) affect outcomes in patients undergoing a staged approach of PCI followed by minimally invasive valve surgery?
Absolute Event Rate: 16.7% vs 0.8%
A staged approach of PCI followed by minimally invasive valve surgery is feasible for concomitant CAD and valvular disease, but intermediate-high CAD complexity is associated with increased repeat revascularization.
May warrant closer surveillance after staged PCI and valve surgery in intermediate-high complexity CAD; leaves open optimal strategy in this population.
OBJECTIVE: A staged approach of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) followed by minimally invasive valve surgery (MIVS) is an alternative to the combined coronary artery bypass graft and valve surgery for patients with concomitant coronary artery (CAD) and valvular heart disease. We sought to evaluate the impact of the complexity of CAD, as assessed by the Syntax score, on the outcomes of the staged approach. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 138 patients who underwent PCI and MIVS at our institution between January 2009 and June 2013. The baseline Syntax score was calculated, and the patients were divided into two groups: low risk (Syntax scores, 0-22) or intermediate-high risk (>22). RESULTS: There were 125 patients with low (mean ± standard deviation, 8 ± 5) and 13 with intermediate-high (mean ± standard deviation, 26 ± 4) Syntax scores. Baseline, PCI, and operative characteristics were similar between the groups, except for an observed higher incidence of peripheral arterial disease, multivessel coronary disease, mitral valve replacement, and a higher predicted The Society of Thoracic Surgeons mortality risk score in the intermediate-high Syntax group. The short-term postoperative complications, 30-day mortality, and 3-year survival (84% vs 77%) were similar between the groups. Patients in the intermediate-high-risk group had a higher incidence of repeat target vessel revascularization during follow-up (0.8% vs 16.7%). CONCLUSIONS: A staged approach of PCI followed by MIVS is a safe and feasible alternative for patients with valvular heart disease and concomitant CAD. However, it may confer an increased incidence of repeat target vessel revascularization in patients with intermediate- to high-complexity CAD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pineda et al. (2017) conducted a cohort in Concomitant coronary artery disease and valvular heart disease (n=138). Intermediate-high complexity CAD (Syntax score >22) vs. Low complexity CAD (Syntax score 0-22) was evaluated on Repeat target vessel revascularization during follow-up. In patients undergoing staged PCI and minimally invasive valve surgery, intermediate-high complexity CAD was associated with higher repeat target vessel revascularization than low complexity CAD (16.7% vs 0.8%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: