Key result
Pulmonary valve heterografts preserved in non-aldehydic L-Hydro® showed significantly less calcification compared to glutaraldehyde preservation at 150 days (P=0.001).
Why the study?
Does non-aldehydic preservation (L-Hydro®) reduce calcification of pulmonary valve heterografts compared to glutaraldehyde preservation in a sheep model?
Does non-aldehydic preservation (L-Hydro®) reduce calcification of pulmonary valve heterografts compared to glutaraldehyde preservation in a sheep model?
p-value: p=0.001
Non-aldehydic preservation (L-Hydro®) of bovine pericardium valved grafts reduces calcification compared to standard glutaraldehyde preservation in a sheep model.
Does not change clinical valve preservation practice; leaves open translation of reduced sheep heterograft calcification to humans.
INTRODUCTION: The cardiac bioprostheses are related to thromboembolic events, infectious and degenerative diseases. Wear is mainly attributed to the denaturation of collagen. Glutaraldehyde, the predominant method of preservation of bioprostheses, favors the calcification process and limits their durability. Several techniques try to contain the degenerative process of bioprostheses. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the process of calcification in vivo pulmonary valve heterografts preserved in non-aldehydic (L-Hydro®). METHODS: Seventeen sheep underwent replacement of the pulmonary artery valved tubular grafts of bovine pericardium. The animals were divided into two groups: Group L-Hydro® (test / n = 14) and Group Glutaraldehyde (control / n = 3). About 150 days after implantation the animals were sacrificed, necropsied and implants subjected to a pathological study, radiological evaluation and measurement of calcium by atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Statistical analysis was obtained through the Fisher's exact test, Student's t or Mann-Whitney test (significance: 5%). RESULTS: The radiological evaluation, the macroscopic and microscopic measurement of serum calcium by atomic absorption spectrophotometry showed increased calcification of the prosthetic group Glutaraldehyde, when compared to denture-HydroR Group L (P = 0.001). Seven animals in Group L-Hydro® (50%) had adherence of the leaflets to the wall of the tube (P = 0.228). CONCLUSIONS: Prostheses preserved in L-Hydro® were more resistant to calcification when compared with glutaraldehyde preserved.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Souza et al. (2012) studied Pulmonary artery valved tubular grafts replacement (n=17). Non-aldehydic preservation (L-Hydro®) vs. Glutaraldehyde preservation was evaluated on Calcification (p=0.001). Pulmonary valve heterografts preserved in non-aldehydic L-Hydro® showed significantly less calcification compared to glutaraldehyde preservation at 150 days (P=0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: