Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Systematic review and meta-analysis reveals higher sensitivity for fat pad sampling than bone marrow biopsy in AL amyloidosis, suggesting combined testing improves diagnostic yield.
In this systematic review, we aimed to assess the diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) of abdominal fat pad sampling and bone marrow biopsy for immunoglobulin light-chain (AL) amyloidosis using organ biopsy as the reference standard. We searched the literature using PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL databases from inception through March 2024. We used QUADAS-2 to assess the risk of bias and the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of evidence (COE). After deduplication, 29,237 records were screened, and 31 studies were included. Twenty-five studies (n=4,649) reported on fat pad sampling, with a pooled sensitivity of 0.77 (95%CI 0.72-0.81), while twenty studies (n=2,771) reported on bone marrow biopsy, with a pooled sensitivity of 0.55 (0.46-0.63). All studies enrolled patients with confirmed disease, specificity was not reported in the included studies. Fat pad aspiration (15 studies, n=1,590) and surgical or punch biopsy (4 studies, n=222) showed similar sensitivities of 0.80 (0.76-0.83) and 0.77 (0.61-0.88), respectively. In a single study (n=612), performing both tests together yielded a sensitivity of 0.89. COE was judged to be Moderate for fat pad sampling and Low for bone marrow biopsy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Azzam et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: