This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
PROBLEM: Among pregnant women, acquired viral infections with a concurrent bacterial infection is a detrimental factor associated to poor prognosis. We evaluate the effect of a viral infection that does not lead to pre-term labor on the response to low doses of lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Our objectives were (i) to characterize the effect of a viral infection concurrent with exposure to microbial products on pregnancy outcome and (ii) to characterize the placental and fetal immune responses to the viral sensitization to LPS. METHOD: C57B/6 wild-type mice were injected with murine gammaherpesvirus 68 (MHV68) at E8.5. Either PBS or LPS was injected i.p. at E15.5. Pregnancy outcome and cytokine/chemokine profile from implantation sites were analyzed by multiplex. RESULTS: LPS treatment of MHV-68-infected animals induced pre-term delivery and fetal death in 100% of the mice. Pre-term labor was characterized by a upregulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines in both placenta and decidua. Similar profiles were observed from MHV-68-infected human primary trophoblast and trophoblast cell lines in response to LPS. CONCLUSION: We describe for the first time that a sub-clinical viral infection in pregnant mice might sensitize to a bacterial infection leading to pre-term delivery. We propose the 'Double Hit Hypothesis' where the presence of a viral infection enhances the effect of bacterial products during pregnancy leading not only to pre-term labor but likely larger adverse outcomes.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cardenas et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: