Key result
The test formulation of 75-mg clopidogrel hydrogen sulfate was bioequivalent to Plavix in both fed and fasted conditions, with all 90% CIs falling within the 80.00% to 125.00% equivalence margin.
Why the study?
Clopidogrel has high intraindividual variability in systemic exposure and efficacy, prompting evaluation of the bioequivalence of two 75-mg formulations under fed and fasted conditions.
Is a test formulation of clopidogrel hydrogen sulfate 75-mg tablets bioequivalent to Plavix in healthy Chinese volunteers under fed and fasted conditions?
RCT (n=132)
Open-label
3-sequence and 3-period crossover (3x3), semireplicated
Is a test formulation of clopidogrel hydrogen sulfate 75-mg tablets bioequivalent to Plavix in healthy Chinese volunteers under fed and fasted conditions?
Effect estimate: Cmax ratio 103.38% and AUC0-t ratio 98.97% (fed) (95% CI 95.68-111.70% and 94.67-103.47% (90% CIs))
A test formulation of clopidogrel hydrogen sulfate 75-mg tablets is bioequivalent to Plavix in healthy Chinese volunteers under both fed and fasted conditions.
Supports substitution with the test formulation; confirms bioequivalence to Plavix in healthy Chinese volunteers.
Clopidogrel is an antiplatelet drug with high intraindividual variability in systemic exposure and efficacy. It has been used for treating atherosclerosis and acute coronary syndrome and in preventing stent restenosis and thrombotic complications after stent implantation in clinical practice for nearly 20 years. In this study we aimed to evaluate the bioequivalence of 2 clopidogrel hydrogen sulfate formulations (75‐mg tablets) under fed (n = 66) and fasted (n = 66) conditions by using the reference‐scaled average bioequivalence method. An open‐label, randomized, 3‐sequence and 3‐period crossover (3×3), semireplicated study was designed and conducted. Clopidogrel concentration of plasma samples was measured by high‐precision liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry. The pharmacokinetic parameters were derived by a noncompartmental model. In the fed condition the geometric least‐squares mean ratios of peak concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration‐time curve (AUC0‐t) were, respectively, 103.38% and 98.97%, and the corresponding 90%CIs were 95.68% to 111.70% and 94.67% to 103.47%. In the fasted condition the geometric least squares mean ratios of Cmax and AUC0‐t were, respectively, 106.53% and 105.77%, and the corresponding 90%CIs were 97.62% to 116.25% and 96.96% to 115.38%. According to the criteria for bioequivalence (80.00% to 125.00%), the test formulations of clopidogrel and Plavix were determined to be bioequivalent.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pei et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in Healthy (n=132). Clopidogrel hydrogen sulfate test formulation vs. Plavix (reference formulation) was evaluated on Bioequivalence based on peak concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC0-t) (Cmax ratio 103.38% and AUC0-t ratio 98.97% (fed), 95% CI 95.68-111.70% and 94.67-103.47% (90% CIs)). The test formulation of 75-mg clopidogrel hydrogen sulfate was bioequivalent to Plavix in both fed and fasted conditions, with all 90% CIs falling within the 80.00% to 125.00% equivalence margin.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: