Why the study?
The study evaluated the safety of a standardized perioperative direct oral anticoagulant management strategy across subgroups defined by DOAC type and dose, surgery bleed risk, renal function, and age.
Does surgical bleed risk, DOAC type, renal function, or age affect bleeding and thromboembolic outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation receiving standardized perioperative DOAC management?
Observational (n=3,007)
Does surgical bleed risk, DOAC type, renal function, or age affect bleeding and thromboembolic outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation receiving standardized perioperative DOAC management?
Absolute Event Rate: 2.9% vs 0.59%
p-value: p=<0.01
In patients with atrial fibrillation on DOACs undergoing elective procedures, surgical bleed risk is a key determinant of major bleeding for those on apixaban, while DOAC type, dose, renal function, and age do not significantly impact perioperative bleeding or thromboembolic outcomes.
May warrant apixaban-specific caution in high-bleed-risk procedures; leaves open differential DOAC effects in observational perioperative data.
Introduction The Perioperative Anticoagulation Use for Surgery Evaluation (PAUSE) Study assessed a standardized perioperative management strategy in patients with atrial fibrillation who were taking a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) and required an elective surgery or procedure. The aim of this substudy is to analyze the safety of this management strategy across different patient subgroups, according to four presurgical variables: (1) DOAC type and dose, (2) surgery/procedure bleed risk, (3) patient renal function, and (4) age. Methods Clinical outcomes analyzed included major bleeding (MB), arterial thromboembolism, any bleeding, and any thromboembolism. We used descriptive statistics to summarize clinical outcomes, where the frequency, proportion, and 95% confidence interval were reported. Fisher's exact tests were used for testing the null hypothesis of independence between the clinical outcome and patient characteristic, where the test p-values were reported. Results There were 3,007 patients with atrial fibrillation requiring perioperative DOAC management. There was no significant difference in bleeding or thromboembolic outcomes according to DOAC type/dose regimen, renal function, or patient age. The rate of MB was significantly higher with high bleed risk procedures than low bleed risk procedures in apixaban-treated patients (2.9 vs. 0.59%; p < 0.01), but not in dabigatran-treated patients (0.88 vs. 0.91%; p = 1.0) or rivaroxaban-treated patients (2.9 vs. 1.3%; p = 0.06). The risk for thromboembolism did not differ according to surgery/procedure-related bleed risk. Conclusion Our results suggest that in DOAC-treated patients who received standardized perioperative management, surgical bleed risk is an important determinant of bleeding but not thromboembolic outcomes, although this finding was not consistent across all DOACs. There were no differences in bleeding and thromboembolism according to DOAC type and dose, renal function, or age.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
MacDougall et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation (n=3,007). High bleed risk procedures vs. Low bleed risk procedures was evaluated on Major bleeding (apixaban-treated patients) (p=<0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: