Key result
The newly defined consensus criteria for metabolic syndrome strongly predicted all-cause cardiovascular disease in men and women, performing similarly to existing definitions.
Why the study?
Does the presence of metabolic syndrome according to various definitions predict cardiovascular disease in a multiethnic U.S. cohort of men and women?
Cohort (n=6,770)
Yes
Does the presence of metabolic syndrome according to various definitions predict cardiovascular disease in a multiethnic U.S. cohort of men and women?
The newly proposed consensus criteria for metabolic syndrome are as effective as existing definitions in predicting cardiovascular events, though significant gender differences exist in the predictive value of individual components.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support CVD risk stratification with consensus criteria in multiethnic U.S. adults; leaves open whether it improves on prior definitions prospectively.
INTRODUCTION: We sought to evaluate the ability of various metabolic syndrome definitions in predicting primary cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcomes in a vast multiethnic U.S. cohort. METHODS: This study included 6,814 self-identified men and women aged 45-84 years enrolled in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) study. Gender-stratified analyses were performed to calculate hazard ratios of CVD, stroke, and mortality associated with various metabolic syndrome definitions and their individual constructs. RESULTS: The hazard ratios [95% confidence interval (CI)] for all-cause CVD in men were 2.90 (2.18-3.85), 2.64 (1.98-3.51), 2.16 (1.62-2.88), 2.56 (1.91-3.44), 1.82 (1.35-2.46), and 2.92 (2.15-3.95) for the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP), American Heart Association (AHA), World Health Organization (WHO), International Diabetes Federation (IDF), European Group for the Study of Insulin Resistance (EGIR), and the newly defined consensus criteria. Hazard ratios in women were 2.11 (1.41-3.15), 2.17 (1.45-3.27), 2.04 (1.37-3.06), 1.91 (1.27-2.88), 1.85 (1.23-2.79), and 2.08 (1.37-3.14), respectively. Metabolic syndrome was strongly associated with stroke risk only in males. In men, all constitutive metabolic syndrome components were continuously and strongly associated with CVD. In women, high-density lipoprotein and triglycerides did not appear to be associated with short term CVD risk. CONCLUSION: We found the newly defined consensus criteria for metabolic syndrome to be similarly predictive of cardiovascular events when compared to existing definitions. Significant gender differences exist in the association between metabolic syndrome, its individual components, and CVD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hari et al. (2011) conducted a cohort in Metabolic syndrome (n=6,770). Metabolic syndrome (consensus criteria) vs. Absence of metabolic syndrome was evaluated on All-cause cardiovascular disease (CVD) in men (HR 2.92, 95% CI 2.15-3.95, p=<0.0001). The newly defined consensus criteria for metabolic syndrome strongly predicted all-cause cardiovascular disease in men and women, performing similarly to existing definitions.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: