Why the study?
Does the presence of metabolic syndrome according to various definitions predict cardiovascular disease in a multiethnic U.S. cohort of men and women?
Population
6,770 asymptomatic, self-identified men and women aged 45-84 years, free of cardiovascular disease at…
Comparison
Presence of metabolic syndrome as defined by… vs Absence of metabolic syndrome
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
average 4.1 years
Key result
The newly defined consensus criteria for metabolic syndrome strongly predicted all-cause cardiovascular disease in men (HR 2.92) and women (HR 2.08), performing similarly to existing definitions.
Authors
Loading...
May support CVD risk stratification with consensus criteria in multiethnic U.S. adults; leaves open whether it improves on prior definitions prospectively.
Cohort (n=6,770)
Yes
Does the presence of metabolic syndrome according to various definitions predict cardiovascular disease in a multiethnic U.S. cohort of men and women?
Hazard Ratio: 2.92 (95% CI 2.15–3.95)
p-value: p=<0.0001
The newly proposed consensus criteria for metabolic syndrome are as effective as existing definitions in predicting cardiovascular events, though significant gender differences exist in the predictive value of individual components.
Hari et al. (2011) conducted a cohort in Metabolic syndrome (n=6,770). Metabolic syndrome (consensus criteria) vs. Absence of metabolic syndrome was evaluated on All-cause cardiovascular disease (CVD) in men (HR 2.92, 95% CI 2.15-3.95, p=<0.0001). The newly defined consensus criteria for metabolic syndrome strongly predicted all-cause cardiovascular disease in men (HR 2.92) and women (HR 2.08), performing similarly to existing definitions.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: