Key result
Real-time 3D echocardiography-derived LV volume and MRI-derived circumferential strain showed high correlation (r2 = 0.65), but significant regional differences in time-delay were observed.
Why the study?
Does real-time 3D echocardiography derived LV volume correlate with MRI derived circumferential strain for assessing mechanical dyssynchrony in CRT candidates?
Observational (n=26)
No
Does real-time 3D echocardiography derived LV volume correlate with MRI derived circumferential strain for assessing mechanical dyssynchrony in CRT candidates?
Effect estimate: r2 = 0.65
While 3D echocardiography and tagged MRI show high correlation for assessing mechanical dyssynchrony, regional differences in time-delay hamper direct comparison between the two modalities.
Caution against interchangeable use in CRT selection; leaves open prospective validation of regional timing for outcome prediction.
OBJECTIVES: To compare regional left ventricular (LV) volume curves obtained with real time three-dimensional echocardiography (RT3DE) with two-dimensional circumferential strain curves obtained by MRI in cardiac resynchronization therapy candidates. BACKGROUND: Several methods using either ultrasound or MRI are used to quantify mechanical dyssynchrony (MD). Theoretically, LV volume and circumferential strain seem related, since both measures are connected to the radius of the ventricle. METHODS: In 21 patients with chronic heart failure, RT3DE and tagged MRI were performed subsequently. Regional LV volume was computed from the ultrasound images. From the MR images, regional circumferential strain was calculated. Cross-correlations with time lags of 1% of the cardiac cycle were performed to compare the curves in corresponding LV segments. Furthermore, peak septal to lateral (SL) delays were compared between modalities. RESULTS: High correlations were found between the curves (r(2) = 0.65 +/- 0.19), but regional differences in time delay between modalities were observed. In the septum, the volume curve was earlier than the strain curve by 1.8 +/- 17.0 time-lags (n.s.), while in the lateral wall, the volume curve was earlier by 3.3 +/- 12.0 time-lags (P < 0.02). There was a non-significant difference between SL delays in the two modalities (volume: -1.0 +/- 8.6%, strain: 3.0 +/- 12.7%, P = 0.17, a positive sign indicates that the lateral wall is delayed). CONCLUSIONS: High correlations were observed between both modalities, but regional differences in time-delay were found. This is possibly inherent to the method of echocardiographic volume calculation and hampers the comparison of both measures for the quantification of MD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rüssel et al. (2008) conducted an observational in Chronic heart failure (n=26). Real-time 3D echocardiography (RT3DE) vs. Tagged MRI was evaluated on Cross-correlation between regional LV volume curves (RT3DE) and circumferential strain curves (MRI) (r2 = 0.65). Real-time 3D echocardiography-derived LV volume and MRI-derived circumferential strain showed high correlation (r2 = 0.65), but significant regional differences in time-delay were observed.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: