Key result
Enhanced external counterpulsation improved Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina class by at least 1 class in 88% of patients, with similar benefits across sex and age subgroups.
Why the study?
Does enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP) improve CCS angina class in patients with chronic stable angina, and is this improvement predicted by hemodynamic effects?
Observational (n=395)
Yes
Does enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP) improve CCS angina class in patients with chronic stable angina, and is this improvement predicted by hemodynamic effects?
EECP effectively improves angina symptoms in chronic stable angina patients across different ages and sexes, though this improvement is not predicted by the hemodynamic effectiveness ratio.
May support EECP for angina relief across age and sex in stable angina; hypothesis-generating and leaves causal benefit open for RCTs.
Enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP) is an effective noninvasive treatment for coronary artery disease. The mechanism of action is felt to be hemodynamic. The complex hemodynamic effects have been simply quantified by calculating a previously described effectiveness ratio (ER). The EECP Clinical Consortium, a clinical registry of 37 centers, prospectively enrolled 395 chronic stable angina patients (79 women, 316 men, mean age 66 years) to examine the relation of the ER to posttreatment improvement in Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina class (CCS). Women and the elderly underwent planned subgroup analysis. The ER was calculated during the first and last hours of a 35-hour course of EECP treatment. After EECP, CCS improved by at least 1 class in 88% of patients, 87% of men and 92% of women (p = NS), and in 89% of patients < or = 66 years and 88% of patients > 66 years old (p = NS). The initial and final ER were similar in patients with and without improvement in CCS. Significant first-hour ER differences were seen between men and women (0.96 +/- 0.03 vs 0.76 +/- 0.04, p<0.005), and between ages < or = 66 and > 66 years old (1.04 +/- 0.04 vs 0.81 +/- 0.03, p<0.0001). However, all subgroups responded equally well to EECP treatment. EECP is effective in improving CCS in chronic stable angina patients; it has comparable effects in men and women and across a broad range of ages. The hemodynamic effect of EECP (ER) does not predict improvement in CCS and may indicate that other factors, such as neurohormonal changes, may have a significant role in mediating the observed EECP benefits.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Styŝ et al. (2001) conducted an observational in Chronic stable angina (n=395). Enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP) was evaluated on Improvement in Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina class (CCS) by at least 1 class. Enhanced external counterpulsation improved Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina class by at least 1 class in 88% of patients, with similar benefits across sex and age subgroups.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: