Key result
First occupational lead exposure resulting in a >3-fold blood lead increment over 2 years did not affect autonomous neural function as captured by heart rate variability.
Why the study?
Because of falling lead exposure, literature relating autonomous nervous function to blood lead has limited relevance.
Does first occupational lead exposure affect heart rate and heart rate variability in newly hired workers?
Cohort (n=195)
Does first occupational lead exposure affect heart rate and heart rate variability in newly hired workers?
A greater than 3-fold increase in blood lead levels from first occupational exposure did not significantly affect autonomous neural function as measured by heart rate variability over 2 years.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Rising blood lead did not alter HRV or nerve conduction; leaves open effects at higher exposures or in other populations.
Because of the falling lead exposure, the literature relating autonomous nervous function to blood lead (BL) has limited relevance. In the longitudinal Study for Promotion of Health in Recycling Lead (URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT02243904), we recorded the 2-year responses of heart rate (HR), HR variability (HRV; Cardiax, International Medical Equipment Developing, Budapest, Hungary), and median nerve conduction velocity (Brevio, NeuMed, West Trenton, NJ), a routine test in occupational medicine, to first lead exposure in 195 newly hired workers (91.3% men; mean age, 27.8 years). High- and low-frequency HRV power and orthostatic HRV responses were derived from 5-minute ECGs in the supine and standing positions by Fourier transform and autoregression. BL was determined by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. From baseline to follow-up, BL increased from 4.22 to 14.1 μg/dL and supine/standing HR from 63.6/75.5 to 67.1/78.8 beats per minute. In analyses stratified by fourths of BL changes, trends in HR and Fourier/autoregressive HRV did not reveal a dose-response curve (0.074≤ P ≤0.98). In multivariable-adjusted mixed models, HR, Fourier/autoregressive HRV, and nerve conduction velocity changes were unrelated to BL except for a weak inverse association between supine HR and BL changes (−0.55%; P =0.029). The expected associations between HRV and HR changes were preserved with no differences at baseline/follow-up. Analyses dichotomized by baseline median BL or cumulative BL index (4.30 μg/dL or 32.1 μg/dL×year) suggested an HRV increase versus decrease in the low versus high baseline exposure group. Thus, a >3-fold BL increment did not affect autonomous neural function as captured by HRV.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yu et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Occupational lead exposure (n=195). Occupational lead exposure vs. Baseline or low exposure was evaluated on Heart rate, heart rate variability, and median nerve conduction velocity (p=0.074≤ P ≤0.98). First occupational lead exposure resulting in a >3-fold blood lead increment over 2 years did not affect autonomous neural function as captured by heart rate variability.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: