Key result
The historical role and clinical utility of measuring renin activity in the diagnosis and management of hypertensive patients is reviewed.
Why the study?
Is the measurement of renin activity useful in the diagnosis and management of hypertensive patients?
Is the measurement of renin activity useful in the diagnosis and management of hypertensive patients?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article discusses the historical context and clinical utility of measuring renin activity in the management of hypertension.
Since the discovery of renin by Tigerstedt and Bergman 80 years ago, controversy has surrounded its role in the diagnosis and management of the hypertensive patient.1 For many years even its existence was questioned. In the 1930's a boost in its popularity occurred when Goldblatt demonstrated that renal-artery constriction produced hypertension.2 This discovery led several groups to postulate that renin was the factor responsible for the hypertension and that a similar cause- and-effect relation might exist in man.3 However, several years passed before refinements in the measurement of renin permitted assessment of this hypothesis. Initially, proponents enthusiastically proclaimed that renin . . .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gordon H. Williams (1976) conducted a review in Hypertension. Measurement of Renin Activity was evaluated. The historical role and clinical utility of measuring renin activity in the diagnosis and management of hypertensive patients is reviewed.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: