Key result
Higher body fat percentage was significantly associated with an increased risk of NAFLD (OR 1.12 per 1% increase), with a threshold effect at 25.1% BFR, and METS-IR mediated 84.7% of this relationship.
Why the study?
The mechanism linking body fat percentage and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease remains unclear.
Is body fat percentage associated with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, and is this mediated by insulin resistance?
Cross-Sectional (n=6,281)
Yes
Is body fat percentage associated with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, and is this mediated by insulin resistance?
Odds Ratio: 1.12 (95% CI 1.06–1.2)
p-value: p=<0.001
METS-IR mediates the majority of the relationship between body fat percentage and NAFLD, with a sharp increase in NAFLD risk observed at body fat percentages below 25%.
METS-IR may mediate BFR-NAFLD link with thresholds; leaves open causality and requires prospective validation.
The mechanism linking body fat percentage (BFR) and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) remains unclear. This study investigated whether the metabolic score for insulin resistance (METS-IR) mediates this relationship and examined threshold effects and population heterogeneity. In this cross-sectional study of 6281 participants from the 2011-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), logistic regression with restricted cubic splines was used to evaluate the BFR-NAFLD association and identify a threshold. A causal mediation analysis quantified the proportion of the BFR-NAFLD association mediated by METS-IR, and subgroup analyses examined differences by sex, race, and income. BFR was positively associated with NAFLD (OR per 1% increase = 1.12, 95% CI 1.06-1.20), with a threshold at 25.103% BFR; below this point, NAFLD risk rose sharply (OR = 1.61) and above it the association plateaued (OR = 1.09). METS-IR mediated 84.7% (95% CI 80.5-90%) of the BFR-NAFLD association and exhibited an inflection at 36.066 (OR = 1.72 below vs. 1.47 above this value). The BFR-NAFLD association was stronger in men (OR = 1.32), non-Hispanic Blacks (OR = 1.15), and low-income individuals (OR = 1.13) (P for interaction < 0.05). METS-IR mediates most of the relationship between body fat and NAFLD, with a clear threshold effect observed. Early intervention targeting insulin resistance may curb NAFLD progression, especially in individuals with BFR below 25%. These findings provide epidemiological evidence for the metabolic mechanism of NAFLD and inform precision prevention strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhao et al. (2025) conducted a cross-sectional in Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) (n=6,281). Body fat percentage (BFR) vs. Lower body fat percentage was evaluated on NAFLD risk (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.06-1.20, p=<0.001). Higher body fat percentage was significantly associated with an increased risk of NAFLD (OR 1.12 per 1% increase), with a threshold effect at 25.1% BFR, and METS-IR mediated 84.7% of this relationship.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: