Key result
Peak oxygen pulse did not predict long-term survival in chronic heart failure (8.4 vs 8.4 ml/beat in non-survivors vs survivors, NS), whereas indexed peak oxygen consumption was an independent predictor.
Why the study?
Does peak oxygen pulse provide better long-term prognostic value than peak oxygen consumption in patients with chronic heart failure?
Cohort (n=178)
No
Does peak oxygen pulse provide better long-term prognostic value than peak oxygen consumption in patients with chronic heart failure?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Peak oxygen consumption, particularly when indexed to predicted values, is a superior independent predictor of long-term survival in chronic heart failure compared to peak oxygen pulse.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the ratio of peak oxygen consumption to peak heart rate (peak oxygen pulse) as a predictor of long term prognosis in chronic heart failure. PATIENTS AND SETTING: 178 consecutive heart failure patients recruited to the cardiology department of a tertiary referral centre between 1986 and 1993. DESIGN: Bicycle ergometry with measurement of respiratory exchange. Mean (SD) follow up was 32 (25) months. RESULTS: Patients who died had a lower peak oxygen consumption (16.0 (5.5) v 18.0 (5.5) ml/min/kg, p = 0.05), lower indexed peak oxygen consumption (52 (14) v 60 (16)%, p = 0.006) but similar peak oxygen pulse (8.4 (2.6) v 8.4 (3.0) ml/beat, NS). The following variables were associated with a good long term prognosis: New York Heart Association class II, non-ischaemic heart failure, peak oxygen consumption > or = 17 ml/min/kg, indexed peak oxygen consumption > 63%. Peak oxygen pulse did not have predictive value. Only indexed peak oxygen consumption remained an independent predictor of survival in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Peak oxygen pulse has lower prognostic value than peak oxygen consumption, especially when the latter is indexed to predicted values.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cohen‐Solal et al. (1997) conducted a cohort in chronic heart failure (n=178). Peak oxygen pulse vs. Peak oxygen consumption was evaluated on long term prognosis (survival) (p=NS). Peak oxygen pulse did not predict long-term survival in chronic heart failure (8.4 vs 8.4 ml/beat in non-survivors vs survivors, NS), whereas indexed peak oxygen consumption was an independent predictor.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: