Key result
In medically treated acute type B aortic dissection, having a single entry tear was associated with a higher median aortic growth rate compared to having two entry tears.
Why the study?
Is the number of identifiable entry tears associated with aortic growth in long-term acute type B aortic dissection?
Cohort (n=60)
Yes
Is the number of identifiable entry tears associated with aortic growth in long-term acute type B aortic dissection?
This study aims to determine if the number of entry tears can predict long-term aortic growth in patients with type B aortic dissection.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May warrant intensified surveillance for single-entry-tear patients; hypothesis-generating for tear-number-based risk models in type B dissection.
Acute type B aortic dissection (ABAD) is the most common aortic catastrophe, and is associated with high mortality rates. Besides clinical predictors, recent reports have also analyzed morphologic predictors for adverse outcomes and aortic growth. Indeed, clinical and bioengineering studies have shown that elevated pressure in the false lumen may result in increased aortic growth (1,2). The pressure in the false lumen is related to its inflow and outflow, and therefore the number of entry tears detected between the true and false lumens may be important in predicting the degree of aortic dilatation in the long term. The goal of this study was to investigate whether the number of identifiable entry tears is associated with aortic growth in long-term ABAD (3-5).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tolenaar et al. (2013) conducted a cohort in Acute type B aortic dissection (n=60). One entry tear vs. Two entry tears was evaluated on Aortic growth rate (mm/year) (p=0.01). In medically treated acute type B aortic dissection, having a single entry tear was associated with a higher median aortic growth rate compared to having two entry tears.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: