Key result
Treatment of bifurcation lesions with Xience V everolimus-eluting stents yielded a 2-year composite rate of death, MI, or TVR of 11.3%, similar to 10.0% in non-bifurcation lesions (P=0.403).
Why the study?
Does everolimus-eluting stent deployment in bifurcation lesions result in similar long-term outcomes compared to non-bifurcation lesions in patients undergoing PCI?
Cohort (n=2,700)
Does everolimus-eluting stent deployment in bifurcation lesions result in similar long-term outcomes compared to non-bifurcation lesions in patients undergoing PCI?
Everolimus-eluting stents demonstrate comparable 2-year safety and efficacy in complex bifurcation lesions compared to non-bifurcation lesions.
Supports EES use in bifurcation PCI; extends observational data but leaves open need for randomized confirmation.
The aim of this analysis was to analyze outcomes of patients undergoing Xience V EES treatment of bifurcation lesions, a subset in which treatment is particularly challenging. The SPIRIT V Study provided an evaluation of the Xience V everolimus eluting stent (EES) performance in complex patient and lesion population. The SPIRIT V Single Arm Study enrolled 2700 patients with de novo coronary artery lesions suitable to be optimally treated with a maximum of four planned Xience V EES. Lesion evaluation was by visual assessment. The outcomes of the 492 patients undergoing Xience V EES stenting of ≥1 bifurcation lesion were compared to those with no bifurcation lesion treated. Compared to those without bifurcation treatment, patients with bifurcation treatment were more likely to have multi-vessel disease (49% vs 40%), left main treatment (3.1% vs 0.9%), more lesions treated (1.5 vs 1.3), calcification (36.4% vs 27.5%), and ostial (17.1% vs 8.2%) and angulated lesions (29.3% vs 21.1%), all P < 0.001. The 30-day composite rate of death, myocardial infarction (MI), target vessel revascularization (TVR) was 4.3% in patients with bifurcation PCI and 2.2% in those with non-bifurcation PCI (P = 0.017). At 2 years, this composite event rate was 11.3% and 10.0% in these two groups, respectively (P = 0.403). Rates of cardiac death, MI, target lesion revascularization (TLR), TVR, and ARC defined definite or probable stent thrombosis (0.4% vs 0.9%, P = 0.402) were not significantly different between the two groups. Despite greater patient and lesion complexity, treatment of patients with bifurcation lesions using the Xience V EES in the SPIRIT V prospective Single Arm Study was safe and effective, with low overall event rates that were similar to those without bifurcation lesion treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Džavík et al. (2012) conducted a cohort in de novo coronary artery lesions (n=2,700). Xience V EES treatment of bifurcation lesions vs. No bifurcation lesion treated was evaluated on Composite rate of death, myocardial infarction (MI), and target vessel revascularization (TVR) at 2 years (p=0.403). Treatment of bifurcation lesions with Xience V everolimus-eluting stents yielded a 2-year composite rate of death, MI, or TVR of 11.3%, similar to 10.0% in non-bifurcation lesions (P=0.403).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: