Key result
Continuous cardiac output measured via invasive pulmonary artery catheter, less invasive FloTrac, and non-invasive pulse wave transit time were compared in off-pump CABG patients.
Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Population
Patients undergoing off pump coronary artery bypass grafting
Comparison
Pulmonary Artery catheter Continuous cardiac Output vs FloTrac vs Pulse Wave Transit Time methods
Cardiac output monitor agreement remains uncertain in off-pump CABG; leaves open optimal device selection pending validation studies.
Comparison of cardiac output using invasive (Pulmonary Artery catheter Continuous cardiac Output), less invasive (FloTrac) and non invasive (Pulse Wave Transit Time) methods in patients undergoing off pump coronary artery bypass grafting - IJCA- Print ISSN No: - 2394-4781 Online ISSN No:- 2394-4994 Article DOI No:- 10.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
J et al. (2019) studied this question. Continuous cardiac output measured via invasive pulmonary artery catheter, less invasive FloTrac, and non-invasive pulse wave transit time were compared in off-pump CABG patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: