Key result
Individuals with the ADD1 rs4963 polymorphism showed a significantly increased risk of hypertension (OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.11-1.33, P < 0.0001).
Why the study?
Does the ADD1 rs4963 polymorphism increase hypertension risk in Asian populations?
Meta-Analysis (n=11,034)
Does the ADD1 rs4963 polymorphism increase hypertension risk in Asian populations?
Odds Ratio: 1.21 (95% CI 1.11–1.33)
p-value: p=< 0.0001
The ADD1 rs4963 polymorphism is associated with a significantly increased risk of hypertension in Asian populations, particularly among Chinese and older individuals.
Some studies investigated the association between ADD1 rs4963 polymorphism and hypertension risk. However, the results remained inconclusive. Thus, we performed a meta-analysis. Published reports were searched in PubMed and Google Scholar. The strength of association was assessed by calculating odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Twelve studies with 5097 cases and 5937 controls were conducted in this study. Individuals with ADD1 rs4963 polymorphism showed an increased hypertension risk (OR = 1.21; 95%CI, 1.11-1.33; P < 0.0001). Subgroup analyses were performed according to country and age. The results showed that Chinese with ADD1 rs4963 polymorphism showed an increased hypertension risk (OR = 1.28; 95%CI, 1.09-1.51; P = 0.003). However, subjects in Japan and India did not have increased hypertension risk. In the subgroup analysis by age, older subjects, but not younger subjects, with ADD1 rs4963 polymorphism showed an increased hypertension risk (OR = 1.19; 95%CI, 1.07-1.32; P = 0.001). In conclusion, this meta-analysis suggested that ADD1 rs4963 polymorphism might be associated with increased hypertension risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qu et al. (2016) conducted a meta-analysis in Hypertension (n=11,034). ADD1 rs4963 polymorphism vs. Without ADD1 rs4963 polymorphism was evaluated on Hypertension risk (OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.11-1.33, p=< 0.0001). Individuals with the ADD1 rs4963 polymorphism showed a significantly increased risk of hypertension (OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.11-1.33, P < 0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: