Key result
Suboptimal device deformation indicating undersizing or oversizing was associated with higher rates of peri-device leaks at 6 months compared to optimal deformation (56% and 30% vs 11%, p=0.019).
Why the study?
Does preprocedural 3D TEE eccentricity index predict device deformation morphology and peri-device leaks after LAAO with the Amplatzer device?
Cohort (n=47)
Does preprocedural 3D TEE eccentricity index predict device deformation morphology and peri-device leaks after LAAO with the Amplatzer device?
p-value: p=0.019
Preprocedural 3D TEE assessment of LAA eccentricity can help predict device deformation and minimize peri-device leaks after LAAO with the Amplatzer device.
Small observational series of multimodality LAA imaging; leaves open optimal modality for device sizing before practice change.
Background/Objectives: Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) has become an alternative to oral anticoagulation in selected patients with atrial fibrillation. The results of transcatheter LAAO were evaluated by conventional cardiac angiography (CCA), fluoroscopy, and 2D and 3D transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). Methods: In 47 consecutive patients (76 ± 8 years), LAAO was performed with the AmplatzerTM device. CCA and 2D and 3D TEE were performed for LAA measurements. The eccentricity of the device landing zone was assessed by 3D TEE as the ratio of the maximal and minimal diameters. The device size was selected depending on the CCA maximal diameter. The postprocedural device lobe morphology was classified by fluoroscopy as “square” type (sign of undersizing), “tire” type (optimal deformation), and “strawberry” type (sign of oversizing). After 6 months, TEE was repeated to evaluate peri-device leaks (PDLs). Results: The postprocedural device morphology was “square” type in 9 (19%), “tire” type in 28 (60%), and “strawberry” type in 10 patients (21%). After 6 months, peri-device leaks were observed in 11 patients (23%), with the lowest incidence in the “tire”-type group (11%) compared with “square” type (56%) and “strawberry” type (30%) (p = 0.019). The 3D TEE eccentricity index with a cut-off value of ≤1.29 (indicating a more circular morphology) was a very specific predictor for excluding postprocedural device deformation of the “strawberry” type (AUC = 0.689; sensitivity 48.7%, specificity 100%). Conclusions: Undersizing as well as oversizing of the LAA occluder, as characterized by deformation type by fluoroscopy, was associated with postprocedural PDLs. The eccentricity of the LAA landing zone by 3D TEE may indicate inadequate size selection of the AmplatzerTM device leading to oversizing in patients with a more eccentric LAA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kirschfink et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation (n=47). Suboptimal device deformation morphology (square or strawberry type) vs. Optimal deformation (tire type) was evaluated on Peri-device leaks at 6 months (p=0.019). Suboptimal device deformation indicating undersizing or oversizing was associated with higher rates of peri-device leaks at 6 months compared to optimal deformation (56% and 30% vs 11%, p=0.019).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: