Key result
Cardiac resynchronization therapy in severe heart failure reduced sympathetic nerve traffic burst frequency by 30.5% at 10 weeks.
Why the study?
Does cardiac resynchronization therapy reduce sympathetic nerve traffic in patients with severe heart failure?
Cohort (n=21)
Does cardiac resynchronization therapy reduce sympathetic nerve traffic in patients with severe heart failure?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cardiac resynchronization therapy exerts a marked and sustained sympathoinhibitory effect in patients with severe heart failure, which may contribute to its prognostic benefits.
Evidence is available that in heart failure, cardiac resynchronization therapy by biventricular pacing improves myocardial function and exercise capacity. Whether this is accompanied by a sustained inhibition of heart failure-dependent sympathoexcitation is uncertain. In 11 heart failure patients (mean+/-SEM age, 68.4+/-1.5 years) in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III and IV under medical treatment with an intraventricular conduction delay (QRS duration > or =130 ms), with a markedly depressed left ventricular ejection fraction, and undergoing implantation of a biventricular pacemaker, we measured beat-to-beat blood pressure and muscle sympathetic nerve traffic. Measurements, which also included echocardiographic and clinical variables, were performed before and approximately 10 weeks after successful resynchronization therapy. Ten age- and NYHA class-matched heart failure patients who were under medical treatment for the same time period served as controls. Long-term resynchronization therapy improved cardiac function and caused a significant increase in systolic blood pressure coupled with an improvement in maximal oxygen consumption and exercise capacity. These effects were coupled with a significant and marked reduction in sympathetic nerve traffic when expressed both as burst frequency over time (44.1+/-3.6 vs 30.7+/-3.0 bs/min, -30.5%, P<0.02) and as burst frequency corrected for heart rate (68.3+/-5.9 vs 47.3+/-4.3 bs/100 beats, -32.1%, P<0.02). No significant change in the aforementioned parameters was seen in the control group. These data provide the first direct evidence that in severe heart failure, resynchronization therapy exerts a marked and sustained sympathoinhibition. Because in heart failure sympathetic overactivity adversely affects prognosis, this may have important clinical implications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grassı et al. (2004) conducted a cohort in Severe heart failure (n=21). Cardiac resynchronization therapy vs. Medical treatment was evaluated on Sympathetic nerve traffic (burst frequency over time) (-30.5%, p=<0.02). Cardiac resynchronization therapy in severe heart failure reduced sympathetic nerve traffic burst frequency by 30.5% at 10 weeks.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: