Key result
Epicardial and pericoronary fat thickness were significantly higher in patients with obstructive coronary artery disease (P=0.013 and P<0.001), with optimal cutoffs of ≥7.2 and ≥12.6 mm respectively.
Why the study?
Epicardial fat is associated with increased cardiovascular risk, but its relationship along with pericoronary fat measured by multidetector CT to coronary calcium score and CAD needed assessment.
Does epicardial and pericoronary fat thickness measured by CT predict the severity of coronary artery disease in patients with suspected CAD?
Observational (n=70)
Does epicardial and pericoronary fat thickness measured by CT predict the severity of coronary artery disease in patients with suspected CAD?
p-value: p=<0.001
Epicardial and pericoronary fat thickness measured by multidetector CT correlate with coronary stenosis severity and can serve as noninvasive predictors of obstructive coronary artery disease.
Epicardial/pericoronary fat measures may refine CAD risk assessment; leaves open incremental value beyond calcium scoring in prospective studies.
ObjectiveTo assess the relationship between epicardial fat (EF) as well as pericoronary fat measured by multidetector computed tomography (CT) and coronary calcium score, and coronary artery disease (CAD).BackgroundEF is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular events. CT is an accurate and highly reproducible method to measure EF and can be used as a noninvasive tool to assess the cardiovascular risk.Patients and methodsThe current study included 70 patients with suspected CAD (low-intermediate probability). All patients were subjected to 256-row multidetector CT coronary angiography scans and were divided into three groups: group 1: no atherosclerosis (20 patients), group 2: nonobstructive atherosclerosis (luminal narrowing <50% in diameter) (25 patients), and group 3: obstructive atherosclerosis (luminal narrowing ≥50%) (25 patients). EF thickness and the mean thickness of the pericoronary fat surrounding the three coronary arteries were measured by CT.ResultsCalcium score, the average EF thickness, and the average pericoronary fat thickness (PCFT) were significantly higher in group 3 compared with other groups (P < 0.001, 0.013, and <0.001, respectively). Receiver operating characteristic curve was used to define the best cutoff value of the thickness of both epicardial and pericoronary fat in predicting obstructive CAD (group 3), and it was more than or equal to 7.2 and 12.6 mm for epicardial and pericoronary fat, respectively.ConclusionThere was a positive correlation between both epicardial and PCFT and the severity of coronary stenosis. Epicardial and PCFT can be used in predicting the severity of CAD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alnaggar et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Suspected coronary artery disease (low-intermediate probability) (n=70). Epicardial and pericoronary fat thickness vs. No or nonobstructive atherosclerosis was evaluated on Obstructive atherosclerosis (luminal narrowing ≥50%) (p=<0.001). Epicardial and pericoronary fat thickness were significantly higher in patients with obstructive coronary artery disease (P=0.013 and P<0.001), with optimal cutoffs of ≥7.2 and ≥12.6 mm respectively.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: