Key result
Dobutamine stress tissue Doppler (Sm) was more sensitive and accurate than WMSI for predicting global functional recovery 1 month after elective PCI.
Why the study?
Does dobutamine stress tissue Doppler imaging (TDI Sm) predict LV functional improvement better than WMSI after elective PCI in patients with hibernating viable myocardium?
Observational (n=60)
Does dobutamine stress tissue Doppler imaging (TDI Sm) predict LV functional improvement better than WMSI after elective PCI in patients with hibernating viable myocardium?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Dobutamine stress tissue Doppler imaging (Sm) is a highly sensitive and accurate predictor of LV functional recovery following elective PCI in patients with hibernating myocardium.
AimTo clarify the value of dobutamine stress tissue Doppler in the evaluation of LV functional improvement after elective PCI.MethodsThe study included 60 patients with hibernating viable myocardium proved by DSE referred for an evaluation of myocardial viability prior to revascularization. Hemodynamic and echocardiographic variables (LVEF, WMSI and TDI Sm) were assessed at rest and during stress. 1 month after PCI follow up echocardiography and TDI were done. Patients were divided into 2 groups: (Group I): 18 patients (30%) with no global functional recovery and (Group II): 42 patients (70%) with global functional recovery.ResultsSBP, DPB, HR, EF, WMSI and (Sm) increased significantly at stress P = 0.001. After 1 month patients were divided into 2 groups according to functional recovery. There were no statistically significant differences between two groups neither as regards age, sex, risk factors (P > 0.05) nor as regards SBP, DBP, HR, rate/pressure product, EF and WMSI during stress but Sm increased during stress and after1 month follow up in Group II (P = 0.001). Univariate regression showed that (Sm) is the only predictor for global functional recovery. ROC curve statistical analysis shows that (Sm) is more sensitive and accurate than (WMSI) in the detection of viable myocardium which predicts improvement after revascularization (sensitivity 100%, 50% and accuracy 93.3%, 83.3% respectively).ConclusionStress TDI provides a feasible and quantitative technique that improves reproducibility of DSE. Sm during stress showed better accuracy than WMSI for the prediction of functional recovery following revascularization and was simple, sensitive and accurate for the detection of subtle myocardial systolic velocity changes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mostafa et al. (2014) conducted an observational in Hibernating viable myocardium (n=60). Dobutamine stress tissue Doppler (TDI Sm) vs. Wall motion score index (WMSI) was evaluated on Global functional recovery (p=0.001). Dobutamine stress tissue Doppler (Sm) was more sensitive and accurate than WMSI for predicting global functional recovery 1 month after elective PCI.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: