Key result
Anticoagulation resulted in complete resolution of a large thoracic aortic mural thrombus at 2 weeks in a 43-year-old woman with a cerebellar infarction.
Why the study?
Does anticoagulation resolve large aortic arch mural thrombus in a young patient with unexplained stroke?
Case Report (n=1)
Does anticoagulation resolve large aortic arch mural thrombus in a young patient with unexplained stroke?
Anticoagulation can effectively treat large mural aortic thrombus in young patients presenting with unexplained stroke, highlighting the importance of imaging the great vessels in stroke workup.
May support anticoagulation for large aortic mural thrombus in young stroke patients; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
A 43-year-old Indian woman was admitted to the intensive care unit, with large cerebellar infarction. A brain CT scan showed a large non-haemorrhagic infarct involving the vermis and cerebellar hemispheres. Transesophageal echocardiography and CT angiography demonstrated a large mural aortic thrombus. No evidence of cardiac or vascular pathology was present. The patient had a high risk for surgical intervention and was treated with anticoagulation. Follow-up imaging 2 weeks later showed complete resolution of the thoracic aortic thrombus. This case report emphasises that imaging of the great vessels of the neck and transesophageal echocardiography should be included in ischaemic stroke work up. A thoracic aortic thrombus should always be considered in young patients with unexplained stroke or peripheral embolism; the condition can be treated effectively with anticoagulation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aldaher et al. (2015) conducted a case report in Aortic arch mural thrombus and cerebellar infarction (n=1). Anticoagulation was evaluated on Resolution of thoracic aortic thrombus. Anticoagulation resulted in complete resolution of a large thoracic aortic mural thrombus at 2 weeks in a 43-year-old woman with a cerebellar infarction.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: