Key result
The Bicarbon prosthetic heart valve showed 3-year survival of 91% for aortic, 92% for mitral, and 66% for double valve replacement, with a 4.7% early death rate and low complication rates.
Cohort (n=105)
No
The Bicarbon bileaflet prosthetic heart valve demonstrated excellent midterm survival and low rates of valve-related complications in a Japanese single-center cohort.
Offers encouraging midterm outcomes for Bicarbon valve; extends single-center evidence but should not yet change practice.
We analyzed midterm results using the Bicarbon valve in a single center. Forty-four patients had aortic valve replacement (AVR), 48 had mitral valve replacement (MVR), and 13 had both aortic and mitral valve replacement (DVR). The mean age of the 105 patients was 61.2 +/- 11.3 years. The mean follow-up was 1.8 +/- 1.1 years with a cumulative follow-up of 188 patient-years. There were 5 early deaths (4.7%: 4 in the AVR group and 1 in the MVR group) and 5 late deaths (2.7% per patient-year: 3 malignancy, 1 cerebral hemorrhage, 1 myocardial infarction). Survival at 3 years was 91 +/- 4% in the AVR group, 92 +/- 5% in the MVR group, and 66 +/- 23% in the DVR group. The linearized incidence of thromboembolic complications, hemorrhagic complications, and paravalvular leaks in all patients was 1.06 +/- 2.34%, 1.60 +/- 2.53%, and 0.53 +/- 2.22% per patient-year, respectively. No other complications were observed. In conclusion, the Bicarbon prosthetic heart valve has shown excellent clinical results associated with a low incidence of valve-related complications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Misawa et al. (2002) conducted a cohort in Valvular heart disease requiring valve replacement (n=105). Bicarbon bileaflet prosthetic heart valve was evaluated on Survival at 3 years and valve-related complications. The Bicarbon prosthetic heart valve showed 3-year survival of 91% for aortic, 92% for mitral, and 66% for double valve replacement, with a 4.7% early death rate and low complication rates.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: