The Bicarbon bileaflet mechanical valve demonstrates good durability and an acceptably low incidence of complications up to 5 years post-implantation.
May support Bicarbon valve selection in observational cohorts; leaves open randomized comparisons to other prostheses.
OBJECTIVE: Fifteen collaborating centers in eight countries present their pooled experience with the new Bicarbon bileaflet valve. METHODS: Between 4/90 and 4/96, 1351 patients, 806 males and 545 females, aged 10 to 83, mean 58.4 +/- 12.4, underwent valve implantation. OPERATIONS: aortic valve replacement (AVR), 726; mitral valve replacement (MVR), 475; double valve replacement (DVR), 150. Additional procedures: CABG, 211; TV repair, 64; other, 152. RESULTS: Mortality: 67 early (seven valve related) and 56 late (40 valve related). Valve thrombosis: six obstructive, three non-obstructive; embolism: nine major cerebral, 37 other. Major bleeding: 29. Hemolysis: two clinically significant. Non-structural dysfunction: 24 paravalvular leaks, one leaflet interference. No structural failure! Endocarditis: 24. Reoperation 48: 22 non-structural dysfunctions, 14 endocarditis, seven thrombosis and embolism, five other. Estimated 5-year freedom from valve-related deaths is 97.2% for AVR and 92.4% for MVR; 4-year freedom from valve related deaths for DVR is 90.5%. Mean calculated NYHA improvement is 1.24. CONCLUSIONS: The Bicarbon mechanical prosthesis is well designed, durable, has good hemodynamic features and an acceptably low incidence of complications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Borman et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: