Why the study?
Does the Bicarbon prosthetic heart valve provide safe and effective long-term outcomes in patients requiring aortic and/or mitral valve replacement?
Does the Bicarbon prosthetic heart valve provide safe and effective long-term outcomes in patients requiring aortic and/or mitral valve replacement?
The Bicarbon mechanical heart valve demonstrates excellent long-term survival and low rates of valve-related complications up to 8 years post-implantation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports favorable 8-year outcomes with Bicarbon valves; leaves open randomized confirmation of comparative safety.
BACKGROUND: We have previously reported mid-term results of a study, which ended in January 2000, on the Bicarbon valve. The study concluded that the valve showed excellent clinical results, associated with a low incidence of valve-related complications. In the present study, the same patients were prospectively followed for an additional 5 years. METHODS: Forty-four patients had aortic valve replacement (AVR), 48 had mitral valve replacement (MVR), and 13 had both aortic and mitral valve replacement (DVR). The mean age of the 105 patients was 61.2 +/- 11.3 years. The mean follow-up was 6.1 +/- 1.9 years with a cumulative follow-up of 616 patient-years. RESULTS: There were 5 early deaths (4.7%: 4 in the AVR group and 1 in the MVR group) and 21 late deaths (3.4%/patient-year: 5 valve related deaths and 16 valve unrelated deaths). Survival at 8 years was 75.2 +/- 7.0% in the AVR group, 76.6 +/- 6.2% in the MVR group, and 55.4 +/- 16.1% in the DVR group. The linearized incidence of thrombo-embolic complications, hemorrhagic complications, and paravalvular leaks in all patients was 0.65 +/- 1.48%, 0.81 +/- 1.69%, and 0.16 +/- 0.54%/patient-year respectively. No other complications were observed. CONCLUSION: The Bicarbon prosthetic heart valve has shown excellent long-term clinical results, associated with a low incidence of valve-related complications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Misawa et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: