Why the study?
LV systolic performance, including LV systolic function and synchrony, has not been well characterized in patients with HFpEF.
Does speckle tracking echocardiography identify impaired LV systolic function and mechanical dyssynchrony in patients with HFpEF compared to subclinical LVDD and healthy controls?
Observational (n=126)
Does speckle tracking echocardiography identify impaired LV systolic function and mechanical dyssynchrony in patients with HFpEF compared to subclinical LVDD and healthy controls?
Impaired left ventricular longitudinal systolic function and mechanical dyssynchrony are present in HFpEF and correlate with heart failure symptoms, suggesting systolic dysfunction contributes to HFpEF pathophysiology.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support GLS use in HFpEF evaluation; hypothesis-generating for systolic dysfunction contribution and requires prospective validation.
AIMS: Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) is considered a key factor associated with heart failure (HF) symptoms in patients with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). However, LV systolic performance, including LV systolic function and synchrony, has not been well characterized in these patients. The aims of this study were to assess to investigate the underlying relationship and differences between subclinical LVDD and HFpEF. METHODS: Eighty-six patients with LVDD were recruited (58 with HFpEF and 28 with subclinical LVDD). Systolic left ventricular (LV) longitudinal strain (LS), systolic longitudinal strain rate (LSrS), early diastolic longitudinal strain rate (LSrE), and late diastolic longitudinal strain rate (LSrA) were measured using speckle tracking echocardiography. LV diastolic and systolic dyssynchrony (Te-SD and Ts-SD) were calculated. Forty age- and sex-matched healthy individuals were enrolled as a control group. RESULTS: LV global LS and LSrS were decreased in patients with HFpEF than in normal controls and subclinical LVDD patients (P < .05). Te-SD and Ts-SD were significantly more prolonged in subclinical LVDD and HFpEF patients than in the control group (P < .05). Reduced LS was associated with HF symptoms in LVDD patients, and a cutoff value of -18% for LS could differentiate HFpEF from subclinical LVDD with 73% sensitivity and 69% specificity. CONCLUSION: LV systolic function and mechanical dyssynchrony were impaired in HFpEF patients. Deteriorated LV longitudinal systolic function was likely correlated with the symptoms of HFpEF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guan et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (n=126). Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction vs. Subclinical LVDD and healthy controls was evaluated on Left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LS) and systolic longitudinal strain rate (LSrS) (p=< .05).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: