Key result
Smartwatches demonstrated insufficient accuracy for clinical standards in measuring heart rate and blood pressure, with interclass correlation coefficients ranging from 0.533 to 0.852.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to examine the reliability and validity of smartwatches measuring heart rate and Blood Pressure.
Do smartwatches provide reliable and valid measurements of heart rate and blood pressure compared to standard home monitors in healthy participants?
Observational (n=88)
Do smartwatches provide reliable and valid measurements of heart rate and blood pressure compared to standard home monitors in healthy participants?
Effect estimate: ICC 0.533 to 0.852
Current smartwatches lack the clinical-grade accuracy required for medical heart rate and blood pressure monitoring, though they may suffice for general everyday use.
Examine the reliability and validity of smartwatches measuring heart rate and Blood Pressure. Methods: Eighty-eight healthy participant is recruited to be measured heart rate and Blood Pressure. the reliability and validity were determined by comparing the smart-watches with the home standard Blood Pressure using mean differences, Bland Altman plot, Interclass correlation (ICC) and Cronbach's alpha. Results: the reliability varied with ICC ranging from 0.533 to 0.852. Two smartwatches showed relatively weak ICC and broad limits of agreement of the Bland–Altman plots at both, heart rate and Blood Pressure Measurement. For heart rate measurement, F1 Smartband Bracelet Watch showed slightly better results than Y2 Plus Smart Wrist Band. conversely, Y2 Plus Smart Wrist Band demonstrated the best accuracy at Systolic measurement. And for Diastolic Blood Pressure was relatively the same in the reliability and validity. Conclusion: reliability and validity of smartwatches use, especially for healthcare still less of accuracy for the clinical standard because the icc was lower than <0.9. but for everyday use, it is good reliability and validity. For future work, the accuracy of sensor reading of smartwatches needs to im-prove to reach the clinical standard.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Putri et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Healthy (n=88). Smartwatches (F1 Smartband Bracelet Watch, Y2 Plus Smart Wrist Band) vs. Home standard Blood Pressure monitor was evaluated on Reliability and validity of heart rate and blood pressure measurement (ICC 0.533 to 0.852). Smartwatches demonstrated insufficient accuracy for clinical standards in measuring heart rate and blood pressure, with interclass correlation coefficients ranging from 0.533 to 0.852.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: